Dyno results thread

Just post charts and set up details.
User avatar
gl_s_r
Posts: 546
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2008 8:57 am
Location: Kent

Re: Dyno results thread

Post by gl_s_r »

In my simple mind turbulence and availability.... think that is the thing to look at.... if it has lots of undisturbed air to gulp down then lovely.

The shape at the top of the stack can promote acceleration so it can be considered as partially important..
Why ask... sometime you just go to do it and find out?
User avatar
agentpineapple
Posts: 15123
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2011 9:16 pm

Re: Dyno results thread

Post by agentpineapple »

very interesting gents, yeti you are a very lucky man.... :wink:
anyways, heres my last dyno print out, as you can see the a/f is a little off and its a bit down on power. it was taken in one of those mobile dyno's with flashing lights on it....































Image
HEY YOU GUYS!!!!!!
User avatar
MacV2
Posts: 17418
Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2007 12:07 pm
Location: Grain

Re: Dyno results thread

Post by MacV2 »

bigspanishmarty wrote:very interesting gents, yeti you are a very lucky man.... :wink:
anyways, heres my last dyno print out, as you can see the a/f is a little off and its a bit down on power. it was taken in one of those mobile dyno's with flashing lights on it....

Image


Surely some mistake...

I didn't think you had a heart !


Didn't you get a print out from the Brands run ? :lol:
Making up since 2007, sometimes it's true...Honest...
User avatar
gl_s_r
Posts: 546
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2008 8:57 am
Location: Kent

Re: Dyno results thread

Post by gl_s_r »

cybercarl wrote:Thanks for posting that Mark, it can be seen clearly in the wireframe. Yes the Mori ones have a taper to them whereas the Dr H ones don't. Also the ring doughnut shape at the top differs. The Dr H ones are more rounded so air will behave differently as it gets sucked in. I have a feeling the Dr Honda's would be better for street use.

So for true (ish) copies of the Mori stack then HPower are the only ones.

Image

Very complicated stuff air capacity and airflow, even right down to quantity. Looking at Yeti's airbox and all the bits in there ie ram tubes. I'm wondering if there is the same cubic capacity inside his airbox as a standard airbox, it's just that the air is fed in differently. In theory it seems logical, more air = more fuel, more fuel and air = more power. Maybe not :think: there must be an optimum amount that can be reached per the size of the combustion space and compression for maximum displacement. But this is getting into Boyle's law and Charles's law territory. :roll:

(:-})

They all have an internal taper of 6 degrees...
Why ask... sometime you just go to do it and find out?
User avatar
agentpineapple
Posts: 15123
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2011 9:16 pm

Re: Dyno results thread

Post by agentpineapple »

Didn't you get a print out from the Brands run ? :lol:[/quote]

to embarrassed to upload the brands dyno....... :oops: :oops: :oops:
HEY YOU GUYS!!!!!!
User avatar
geodude
Posts: 3368
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:15 pm
Location: Southampton, Hampshire
Contact:

Re: Dyno results thread

Post by geodude »

I'm looking forward to getting my results. I reckon I'll be lucky to get 120 though. I'm worried it might start me down a route of more expense!! lol
“Only by constantly developing your insight and knowledge can you fulfil your responsibility to ride safely and effectively”
“He who rides fastest, rides alone!"
Image
YouTube Website Facebook Bike accessories
User avatar
AMCQ46
Posts: 16535
Joined: Mon May 11, 2009 4:54 pm
Location: Worcestershire / Warwickshire border

Re: Dyno results thread

Post by AMCQ46 »

very interesting to see the engineering drawings, that puts it into context...........out of interest did you also measure the standard plastic ones so we can see how the length compares?
AMcQ
User avatar
motostorm
Posts: 153
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 8:05 pm

Re: Dyno results thread

Post by motostorm »

:thumbup:
Image
its not the dog in the fight its the fight in the dog
User avatar
gl_s_r
Posts: 546
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2008 8:57 am
Location: Kent

Re: Dyno results thread

Post by gl_s_r »

AMCQ46 wrote:very interesting to see the engineering drawings, that puts it into context...........out of interest did you also measure the standard plastic ones so we can see how the length compares?
I can do this after Easter if you would like that?
Why ask... sometime you just go to do it and find out?
YETI
Posts: 496
Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2010 10:42 am
Location: SURREY

Re: Dyno results thread

Post by YETI »

knew a clever fella would be along at some point ,
thanks gl_s_r , :thumbup:
I thought I had the only set of MORIWAKI velocity stacks
for a storm just kinda knockin around ?? :eh:

YETI..
Image
User avatar
agentpineapple
Posts: 15123
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2011 9:16 pm

Re: Dyno results thread

Post by agentpineapple »

YETI wrote:knew a clever fella would be along at some point ,
thanks gl_s_r , :thumbup:
I thought I had the only set of MORIWAKI velocity stacks
for a storm just kinda knockin around ?? :eh:

YETI..
looks like you have compition yeti....... :wink:
HEY YOU GUYS!!!!!!
edds11
Posts: 550
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 12:19 pm
Location: Scunthorpe

Re: Dyno results thread

Post by edds11 »

cc x max rev's / 2 (4 stroke only one being induction, 2 strokes per revolution ) = max capacity of air. then divide by 60 gives you total cc of air change per second in the airbox. I think
User avatar
VTRDark
Posts: 20010
Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2012 9:24 pm

Re: Dyno results thread

Post by VTRDark »

Nice one edds :thumbup: so I am on to something then with there being a point where it has a negative effect.
then divide by 60
where the 60 come from. And with the revs would that be where the rev limiter is set a, so already pre-determined by the manufacturer. Maths is not my strong point. :(

(:-})
==============================Enter the Darkside
User avatar
MacV2
Posts: 17418
Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2007 12:07 pm
Location: Grain

Re: Dyno results thread

Post by MacV2 »

cybercarl wrote:Nice one edds :thumbup: so I am on to something then with there being a point where it has a negative effect.
then divide by 60
where the 60 come from. And with the revs would that be where the rev limiter is set a, so already pre-determined by the manufacturer. Maths is not my strong point. :(

(:-})
''then divide by 60 gives you total cc of air change per second in the airbox.

Maths ain't my strong point either but there are definitely 60 seconds to a minuet. :wink:
Making up since 2007, sometimes it's true...Honest...
User avatar
AMCQ46
Posts: 16535
Joined: Mon May 11, 2009 4:54 pm
Location: Worcestershire / Warwickshire border

Re: Dyno results thread

Post by AMCQ46 »

gl_s_r wrote:
AMCQ46 wrote:very interesting to see the engineering drawings, that puts it into context...........out of interest did you also measure the standard plastic ones so we can see how the length compares?
I can do this after Easter if you would like that?
yes please :thumbup:
AMcQ
Post Reply