Gearing question

General Bike chat
Post Reply
Giddsy
Posts: 233
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 6:22 pm
Location: Brighton, Sussex

Gearing question

Post by Giddsy »

Have searched previous posts but not sure of answer so...

What do you reckon

a) drop one on front and add one on rear (15/42)

or

b) keep front the same and add two to rear (16/43)

Am looking for more fun but don't want it to be totally crazy all of the time...

Thanks for your input...

James
User avatar
Pete.L
Forum Health And Safety Officer
Posts: 7307
Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2003 5:09 pm
Location: Bristol

Re: Gearing question

Post by Pete.L »

I'm a rear man myself :wink:

Supposed to be kinder on the chain but I still managed to wear them out pretty quick. Also think it's the best mod out there for the bucks :biggrin

Pete.l
My new ride is a bit of a Howler and I love to make her Squeal
User avatar
Jonesey
Posts: 643
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2008 8:58 am
Location: Essex

Re: Gearing question

Post by Jonesey »

I went for 17/43 and it definitely gives it more shove (well fells like it anyway)
Good mod for a few quid.
Chris.
Unus Dies Gingiber Mos Hereditas Orbis terrarum.
mik_str
Posts: 2149
Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2004 10:45 pm
Location: Montreal, Canada

Re: Gearing question

Post by mik_str »

17/43 would actually be taller than the stock 16/41....

15/42 is slightly lower than 16/43. Either one will improve acceleration noticeably.

Use the link below if you want to get an idea about the outcomes of various combinations:
http://superhawkforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=8821
99 VTR1000F Firestorm, a.k.a. The Carbon Express
Giddsy
Posts: 233
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 6:22 pm
Location: Brighton, Sussex

Re: Gearing question

Post by Giddsy »

Thanks all.

That is a great speadsheet milk_str, cheers.

15/42 looks like it should be more than fine.... 8)
User avatar
sirch345
Site Admin
Posts: 22404
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2003 10:35 pm
Location: The West Country.

Re: Gearing question

Post by sirch345 »

Am looking for more fun but don't want it to be totally crazy all of the time...
Personally for what you're after I'd recommend a 43 tooth rear sprocket. It's definitely better than standard, but not too mental.

Chris.
Giddsy
Posts: 233
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 6:22 pm
Location: Brighton, Sussex

Re: Gearing question

Post by Giddsy »

Sorry guys another question on this.

I have looked on gearing commander and can't be totally sure of the answer.

If I go up 2 teeth on rear can I use standard chain length?

Same question for -1 front and +1 rear.

Thanks again for patience!

James
User avatar
Jonesey
Posts: 643
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2008 8:58 am
Location: Essex

Re: Gearing question

Post by Jonesey »

Thanks mik, you're quite right, I actually have 16/43!! (wakey wakey jonesey!) :roll:
Giddsy, with 16/43 I used standard chain and it was fine.
Chris.
Unus Dies Gingiber Mos Hereditas Orbis terrarum.
Giddsy
Posts: 233
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 6:22 pm
Location: Brighton, Sussex

Re: Gearing question

Post by Giddsy »

Thought so - thanks Chris
User avatar
sirch345
Site Admin
Posts: 22404
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2003 10:35 pm
Location: The West Country.

Re: Gearing question

Post by sirch345 »

Jonesey wrote: Giddsy, with 16/43 I used standard chain and it was fine.
Chris.
I'll 2nd that :) but the wheel will be pretty much up to the front of the slots in the swingarm.

You want one of these for a Hornet, this will fit the firestorm as it's the same, apart from, it has 43 teeth and not 41:-
http://www.mandp.co.uk/productinfo.aspx ... ier3url=JT

**EDIT** It won't allow me to link direct to the Hornet one, but you can do that yourself from the drop down menu in the link. Here's a pic of the exact one. Right code and price included:-
Image

HTH,

Chris.
Giddsy
Posts: 233
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 6:22 pm
Location: Brighton, Sussex

Re: Gearing question

Post by Giddsy »

Thanks a lot for that Chris - spot on!

Ordered now so looking forward to fitting...
Post Reply