dyno run today!!!!!!!

[agentpineapple]

sounds like a plan lloydie.......

[lloydie]

Good luck tomorrow mate fingers crossed it will be set up perfect

[agentpineapple]

Good luck tomorrow mate fingers crossed it will be set up perfect

i doubt it mate, but if its 90% that would be a great starting point......

[Vtrkidda]

i'm thinking of asking tony to build me an engine, with maybe a little bit more ooomph!!!!!!!!!

I would like that to but can't afford it :-(
I will be putting £500 aside over the next few months for a good engine but if I can't find one I will just save up for an other storm with low miles . Swap my bling over and sell this one to recover some of the cost

Tails selling a black one

[agentpineapple]

ok here goes, it's bad news i'm afraid, but tbh this is what i expected, my babys running very poorly indeed. only 88.95bhp at 9663rpm , its running very very lean.
the torque figures were a surprise tho 90.3 nm at 5650rpm
heres the graph


i'm really looking forward to it once its sorted, tbh i think my bikes quick now, once its running right it should be ballistic......
mr dyno man reckons its gonna cost between £200 to £300 to sort it out
i'll be getting it done when i get back from spain towards the end of july.
mr dyno man said the main reason for the bike being so slow was that bloody black petrol tank........

[AMCQ46]

Lean but then goes very rich at the top end. Power curve is not happy above 7000

[MacV2]

That must have left you felling a little blue..........

[lloydie]

I would take it some where else mate as the storm with your mods will never get 90 torque . Something fishy there mate

[agentpineapple]

i must admit that torque figure doesn't seem correct, the strange thing is the bike rides/pulls fine, even tony rode it and thought it wasn't bad, so its deffo got some grunt but 90nm's hmmmmm i dunno, unless i ride another bike back to back i doubt i'll ever know. what sort of torque figure should i be achieving 70's???
i might still use tonys guy in kent, i'm hoping to pay less than £300 but maybe thats wishful thinking

[lloydie]

High 60s low 70s to be honest .
And I would take it to Tony's man.
As he is a proven tester and tuner

[leevtr]

I would take it some where else mate as the storm with your mods will never get 90 torque . Something fishy there mate

Figures in Newton Metres, not Foot Pounds. ft/lbs would be around the 70 mark.

[lloydie]

Good point I missed that :-(

[rob...]

here's mine from when it was totally standard, for comparison.

[luca]

90.3 nm is 66.6 ft lbs. sounds about right for torque.

[tony.mon]

Mixture isn't awful, as you say, lean near top end but not unexpected with cans and a filter.

Take the printouts to Tony at HM and he'll sort you out, probably in one jet/carb change and one run, the sod.
The scales on your chart are quite fine, exaggerating the differences in stoichiometric ratio.

Here's an old one of mine for reference:

(The address on the top is HM's old address, by the way; they're at Edenbridge now).