Evidence that long stacks are better?

General Bike chat
User avatar
Kev L
Posts: 11288
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 9:57 pm
Location: Hertford, England

Re: Evidence that long stacks are better?

Post by Kev L »

With everything else being set up correctly and stock jetting & airfilter I liked the two long stacks. Now I have the Dr Honda stacks, K&N filter & Factory pro jet kit, it's more of the same. :thumbup:
Carpe diem, quam minimum credula postero
F3, 954 USD front, K Tech springs, Braced swinger, Ohlins shock, Six spoke Mockesini wheels, Harris rearsets, QaT, Flywheel diet!, A&L stacks, stick coils, K&N, FP Ti jets, Mori pipe's [colour]
tony.mon
Posts: 16301
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 10:46 pm
Location: Norf Kent

Re: Evidence that long stacks are better?

Post by tony.mon »

I did do a back-to-back test on the same day, same dyno a while back, comparing the setups as std, (one short, one long) to two long.
Third graph down shows the differences.

I never bothered with dyno-ing it two short ones, as I wouldn't tune a Storm for top end, you might as well have bought an IL4 in the first place.

http://www.vtr1000.org/phpBB3/viewtopic ... ng#p113994
It's not falling off, it's an upgrade opportunity.
User avatar
Flatline
Posts: 3458
Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2009 11:30 am
Location: Leeds

Re: Evidence that long stacks are better?

Post by Flatline »

Thanks Tony

Thats the evidence sorted
Post Reply