
Evidence that long stacks are better?
Re: Evidence that long stacks are better?
With everything else being set up correctly and stock jetting & airfilter I liked the two long stacks. Now I have the Dr Honda stacks, K&N filter & Factory pro jet kit, it's more of the same. 

Carpe diem, quam minimum credula postero
F3, 954 USD front, K Tech springs, Braced swinger, Ohlins shock, Six spoke Mockesini wheels, Harris rearsets, QaT, Flywheel diet!, A&L stacks, stick coils, K&N, FP Ti jets, Mori pipe's [colour]
F3, 954 USD front, K Tech springs, Braced swinger, Ohlins shock, Six spoke Mockesini wheels, Harris rearsets, QaT, Flywheel diet!, A&L stacks, stick coils, K&N, FP Ti jets, Mori pipe's [colour]
Re: Evidence that long stacks are better?
I did do a back-to-back test on the same day, same dyno a while back, comparing the setups as std, (one short, one long) to two long.
Third graph down shows the differences.
I never bothered with dyno-ing it two short ones, as I wouldn't tune a Storm for top end, you might as well have bought an IL4 in the first place.
http://www.vtr1000.org/phpBB3/viewtopic ... ng#p113994
Third graph down shows the differences.
I never bothered with dyno-ing it two short ones, as I wouldn't tune a Storm for top end, you might as well have bought an IL4 in the first place.
http://www.vtr1000.org/phpBB3/viewtopic ... ng#p113994
It's not falling off, it's an upgrade opportunity.
Re: Evidence that long stacks are better?
Thanks Tony
Thats the evidence sorted
Thats the evidence sorted