GPI Gear Position Indicators...good or bad...poll

General Bike chat

gear position indicators.......good or bad

good.....(a useful gadget)
6
43%
bad......(another distraction)
0
No votes
would own/use one.
3
21%
wouldn't own/use one.
4
29%
have or do own one but think they ain't worth it and would bother in the future.
1
7%
 
Total votes: 14

callam_nffc
Posts: 1166
Joined: Thu Mar 07, 2013 8:55 pm
Location: Worcester

Re: GPI Gear Position Indicators...good or bad...poll

Post by callam_nffc »

Virt wrote:
MacV2 wrote:Marty..opps sorry 57276, can you count to 6 ? if so you don't need a GPI...simples
If he can count to 57276 I'm sure he can count to 6 !! :lol:
Problem is marty thinks that's his date of birth ;)
CBR125 - XJ600S DIVERSION - YZF600R THUNDERCAT - VTR1000 FIRESTORM
I still crave a supermoto...
User avatar
MacV2
Posts: 18046
Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2007 12:07 pm
Location: Grain

Re: GPI Gear Position Indicators...good or bad...poll

Post by MacV2 »

Virt wrote:
MacV2 wrote:Marty..opps sorry 57276, can you count to 6 ? if so you don't need a GPI...simples
If he can count to 57276 I'm sure he can count to 6 !! :lol:
Yeah but to count that high he has to take his shoes & socks off & have another 5727 barefoot people around as well...
Making up since 2007, sometimes it's true...Honest...
Virt
Posts: 6793
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2012 12:35 pm
Location: Leicestershire

Re: GPI Gear Position Indicators...good or bad...poll

Post by Virt »

MacV2 wrote:
Yeah but to count that high he has to take his shoes & socks off & have another 5727 barefoot people around as well...
I think there's a flaw with your maths there...
Slowly approaching the more bikes than birthdays achievement
User avatar
MacV2
Posts: 18046
Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2007 12:07 pm
Location: Grain

Re: GPI Gear Position Indicators...good or bad...poll

Post by MacV2 »

Virt wrote:
MacV2 wrote:
Yeah but to count that high he has to take his shoes & socks off & have another 5727 barefoot people around as well...
I think there's a flaw with your maths there...
Go on then...
Making up since 2007, sometimes it's true...Honest...
Virt
Posts: 6793
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2012 12:35 pm
Location: Leicestershire

Re: GPI Gear Position Indicators...good or bad...poll

Post by Virt »

MacV2 wrote:
Go on then...
Either that or there's a flaw with his physical anatomy thingy...

But assuming there isn't.. If he can only count to 6 on his toes, then he'd only be able to count to 6 on other people toes.

So 6 + (6 * 5727) != 57276
Slowly approaching the more bikes than birthdays achievement
User avatar
AMCQ46
Posts: 16745
Joined: Mon May 11, 2009 4:54 pm
Location: Worcestershire / Warwickshire border

Re: GPI Gear Position Indicators...good or bad...poll

Post by AMCQ46 »

Virt, I think there is a flaw in
a) your anatomical knowledge
b) your understanding of the drugs Mac is on
c) what BSM [can we call him that, will the MIB visit us?.........he is a mutant experiment @] looks like
AMcQ
User avatar
lloydie
Posts: 20928
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 11:16 pm
Location: In the garage somewhere in Coventry

Re: GPI Gear Position Indicators...good or bad...poll

Post by lloydie »

Oi vtr14575368 !
WTf you should of done what I did when I changed mine :-)
User avatar
MacV2
Posts: 18046
Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2007 12:07 pm
Location: Grain

Re: GPI Gear Position Indicators...good or bad...poll

Post by MacV2 »

Virt wrote:
MacV2 wrote:
Go on then...
Either that or there's a flaw with his physical anatomy thingy...

But assuming there isn't.. If he can only count to 6 on his toes, then he'd only be able to count to 6 on other people toes.

So 6 + (6 * 5727) != 57276
Your right I am wrong as i divided by 10 not 20 so it should be...2863 barefoot people

20 digits fingers & toes.. :lol: :lol: He's not counting to 6...''it said if he can count to 57276'' ...now get back to work...
Making up since 2007, sometimes it's true...Honest...
User avatar
AMCQ46
Posts: 16745
Joined: Mon May 11, 2009 4:54 pm
Location: Worcestershire / Warwickshire border

Re: GPI Gear Position Indicators...good or bad...poll

Post by AMCQ46 »

lloydie wrote: when I changed mine :-)

I was wondering what happend there as well...........thought I might have caught that thing that Kev has.......you know the forgetty thing, whats it called now?
AMcQ
User avatar
MacV2
Posts: 18046
Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2007 12:07 pm
Location: Grain

Re: GPI Gear Position Indicators...good or bad...poll

Post by MacV2 »

AMCQ46 wrote:Virt, I think there is a flaw in
a) your anatomical knowledge ...very poor very worrying...bloody gcse's
b) your understanding of the drugs Mac is on...believe it or not just ibuprofen & parrots eat em all...
c) what BSM [can we call him that, will the MIB visit us?.........he is a mutant experiment @] looks like
... :lol: :lol:
Making up since 2007, sometimes it's true...Honest...
User avatar
lloydie
Posts: 20928
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 11:16 pm
Location: In the garage somewhere in Coventry

Re: GPI Gear Position Indicators...good or bad...poll

Post by lloydie »

but i wasnt being chased by MIB i just wanted to loose the cbr 8)
Virt
Posts: 6793
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2012 12:35 pm
Location: Leicestershire

Re: GPI Gear Position Indicators...good or bad...poll

Post by Virt »

MacV2 wrote:...now get back to work...

I would but the code I've been given to fix is buggered beyond belief!!!

It calls the same procedure several times, fair enough. But even though there aren't any statements to decide what it does each time, so it does the full contains of said procedure each time, it doesn't... So I get a dodgy output. So I thought I'd annoy everyone here instead :D To remind you all, or some of you rather, that you get to spend Saturday with me. Aren't you bloody lucky? :wink:

And I'm gonna point out I got a high A in my biology GCSE :lol:
Slowly approaching the more bikes than birthdays achievement
User avatar
lloydie
Posts: 20928
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 11:16 pm
Location: In the garage somewhere in Coventry

Re: GPI Gear Position Indicators...good or bad...poll

Post by lloydie »

Virt wrote:
MacV2 wrote:...now get back to work...

I would but the code I've been given to fix is buggered beyond belief!!!

It calls the same procedure several times, fair enough. But even though there aren't any statements to decide what it does each time, so it does the full contains of said procedure each time, it doesn't... So I get a dodgy output. So I thought I'd annoy everyone here instead :D To remind you all, or some of you rather, that you get to spend Saturday with me. Aren't you bloody lucky? :wink:

And I'm gonna point out I got a high A in my biology GCSE :lol:
Dinners on you then virt :-)
Virt
Posts: 6793
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2012 12:35 pm
Location: Leicestershire

Re: GPI Gear Position Indicators...good or bad...poll

Post by Virt »

lloydie wrote:
Virt wrote:

I would but the code I've been given to fix is buggered beyond belief!!!

It calls the same procedure several times, fair enough. But even though there aren't any statements to decide what it does each time, so it does the full contains of said procedure each time, it doesn't... So I get a dodgy output. So I thought I'd annoy everyone here instead :D To remind you all, or some of you rather, that you get to spend Saturday with me. Aren't you bloody lucky? :wink:

And I'm gonna point out I got a high A in my biology GCSE :lol:
Dinners on you then virt :-)
Nah, I prefer other people paying. Makes it easier to decide whether to put out or not...

And on my pittance of pay I can't afford to take myself out :thumbdown: lord knows the dirty deeds I'm gonna be doing for my new PC soon :p
Slowly approaching the more bikes than birthdays achievement
User avatar
MacV2
Posts: 18046
Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2007 12:07 pm
Location: Grain

Re: GPI Gear Position Indicators...good or bad...poll

Post by MacV2 »

A high A in gcse biology very good, you must of read the questions right to get that...shame you cant read post right then init... :lol: :lol:
Making up since 2007, sometimes it's true...Honest...
Post Reply