redpig wrote:It wouldnt rust tho would it, credit where credit is due


redpig wrote:It wouldnt rust tho would it, credit where credit is due
But it makes no sense, everybody was posting screenshots except themagentpineapple wrote: Tracy Mckie Peart This is the Appreciation group, there have been 472 members for a long time now, the numbers have barely changed so I'm not sure why you feel the need to mention the member numbers? It is not the owners group. The group if far far bigger than 1 bike that was bought as seen and not inspected and it is not a place for personal attacks, malicious finger pointing or anything else. If there is a problem, you need to take it up with that person direct and not cast aspersions or try to black mark other people who have been members for a long time, and have built a good reputation by tagging them directly onto something they had no working involvement in. The group holds no tolerance for personal attacks of that nature, the guy who sold it is ultimately responsible for it when selling it on. Half arsed and snide comments will almost certainly be deleted as this is not a place. The facts may be elusive, the horses mouth is usually the best place to get first hand info inho. I think you might find not a lot of groups,regardless of who is Admin, tolerate personal attacks and finger pointing and gen delete posts of such a nature as they deliberately incite animosity within the group, esp if the person who posted made no attempt to get the facts and feels it their right to slander others without proof etc. Everyone is free to join or leave the group at any time they wish.
so as I read it, they.... had no working involvement in
and there is no apology either, just denial.
a very sad state of affairs indeed......
Apparently it's been put up and removed several times but it's currently back on thereYETI wrote:So is the post on the appreciation group or was it removed by admin ? Surely if tracy and dave have done nothing wrong and the bike was fine when it went back to Neil there is no problem with the post being on the page as it's just a brought as seen bike posted up by the new owner .
BUT :
If the work is shoddy , dangerous , downright awful and was done by dave and tracy was sending messages to say the work was progressing nicely pay us some money then that's a whole different story .
Why has she ( on daves behalf ) not come forward on this forum to tell how Neil is lying his butt off ? And showing proof of that ? With bills for parts and possibly photos of the work in progress and the messages sent to confirm work being completed ! .
I'm sure if I were in the position of dave and tracy I would be pulling out all the stops to prove I was the damaged party in this not some feeble jumped up replies as she has done so far ??
Regards
YETI ..
And not even wrapped in news paper and set on fire !!!AMCQ46 wrote:shitting on your own doorstep springs to mind
In a word "YES"AMCQ46 wrote:is this where Mac, myself and a few others sit smugly at the side and say that our first impressions were correct and we were right to stay right out of that circle?
![]()
YETI wrote:So is the post on the appreciation group or was it removed by admin ? Surely if tracy and dave have done nothing wrong and the bike was fine when it went back to Neil there is no problem with the post being on the page as it's just a brought as seen bike posted up by the new owner .
BUT :
If the work is shoddy , dangerous , downright awful and was done by dave and tracy was sending messages to say the work was progressing nicely pay us some money then that's a whole different story .
Why has she ( on daves behalf ) not come forward on this forum to tell how Neil is lying his butt off ? And showing proof of that ? With bills for parts and possibly photos of the work in progress and the messages sent to confirm work being completed ! .
I'm sure if I were in the position of dave and tracy I would be pulling out all the stops to prove I was the damaged party in this not some feeble jumped up replies as she has done so far ??
Regards
YETI ..