43 Tooth rear Sprocket

General Biker Banter
User avatar
VTRDark
Posts: 20010
Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2012 9:24 pm

Re: 43 Tooth rear Sprocket

Post by VTRDark »

if your bike only makes power at 7000, i would take it back
Peak power that would be! Funningly enough I was coming through Blackwall tunnel the other day, in slow moving traffic, doing around 20mph. I found myself caught between two gears so decided to slip into the lower gear, revs up higher than normal, 7000ish Then rolled on and off the throttle from time to time and used engine braking. My cans where screaming!!! but the bike had the power right there and then. It's not often I use high revs in slow moving traffic as I like the exhaust sound (exhaust gives a deeper tone low down) but higher revs in slow moving traffic was a little eye opener. :biggrin I usually keep that range for more open roads.

(:-})
==============================Enter the Darkside
User avatar
koko
Posts: 57
Joined: Sat Aug 03, 2013 6:23 pm
Location: DORSET

Re: 43 Tooth rear Sprocket

Post by koko »

Mmm. Ive been commuting to work this week. Standard gearing on mine 70mph is 3750 revs! Reserve light has just come on at128.7 miles. 16 litre tank.average speed 70-80mph
NOT SO MEAN,NOT SO LEAN,EX-MAROON MACHINE!
User avatar
VTRDark
Posts: 20010
Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2012 9:24 pm

Re: 43 Tooth rear Sprocket

Post by VTRDark »

Standard gearing on mine 70mph is 3750 revs! Reserve light has just come on at128.7 miles.
That might explain my bad mileage. :lol: Drop it down a gear and your revs will go up, you can still go the same speed. :thumbup:

(:-})
==============================Enter the Darkside
User avatar
koko
Posts: 57
Joined: Sat Aug 03, 2013 6:23 pm
Location: DORSET

Re: 43 Tooth rear Sprocket

Post by koko »

Is it better to go -1 on the front or up to a 43 on the rear?
NOT SO MEAN,NOT SO LEAN,EX-MAROON MACHINE!
User avatar
cheekykev
Posts: 1133
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 9:12 pm
Location: Cheshire

Re: 43 Tooth rear Sprocket

Post by cheekykev »

I'm one down at the front and two up at rear, it's great fun :Shock1:
Like what you do
Do what you like
He who wonders isn't always lost
7moore7
Posts: 23
Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2013 1:16 am
Location: Phoenix, AZ

Re: 43 Tooth rear Sprocket

Post by 7moore7 »

bigtwinthing wrote:
8541Hawk wrote:
Bloody hell you must be some rider if you can feel about 5mm longer on the wheelbase!!! and if your bike only makes power at 7000, i would take it back, lighening the flywheel will lose engine braking, which twins are meant to have. Are you sure you have not got a V Twin with 4 cylinders?

regards Paul.
Actually, lightening the flywheel increases engine braking. The flywheel is just rotational weight. So it will want to retain it's momentum more as it gets heavier. What this means is that if it is spinning at high speeds, it takes more energy to slow it down the heavier it gets. Similar trying to start or stop an empty merry-go-round versus one full of kids.

Engine braking comes from cylinder compression resistance (not flywheel weight). When this doesn't have to fight the momentum of the flywheel, it is even more noticeable.
User avatar
Furrybiker
Posts: 748
Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 3:08 pm
Location: NW London

Re: 43 Tooth rear Sprocket

Post by Furrybiker »

Doesnt the different sprocket size affect the speedo reading though? Probably not by much but if you are living on the ragged edge of legality :shifty: it may be enough!

I find that the tank range is better in 4th or 5th on the motorway. I have a 43t sprocket on the rear, the front is standard, I also find it makes the bike easier to ride in town, before it felt as though neither 1st or 2nd was quite right at low speeds.
User avatar
bigtwinthing
Posts: 5577
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2012 7:52 pm
Location: Hampshire

Re: 43 Tooth rear Sprocket

Post by bigtwinthing »

7moore7 wrote:
bigtwinthing wrote:
8541Hawk wrote:
Bloody hell you must be some rider if you can feel about 5mm longer on the wheelbase!!! and if your bike only makes power at 7000, i would take it back, lighening the flywheel will lose engine braking, which twins are meant to have. Are you sure you have not got a V Twin with 4 cylinders?

regards Paul.
Actually, lightening the flywheel increases engine braking. The flywheel is just rotational weight. So it will want to retain it's momentum more as it gets heavier. What this means is that if it is spinning at high speeds, it takes more energy to slow it down the heavier it gets. Similar trying to start or stop an empty merry-go-round versus one full of kids.

Engine braking comes from cylinder compression resistance (not flywheel weight). When this doesn't have to fight the momentum of the flywheel, it is even more noticeable.
hmmm i dont agree about the engine braking sorry, lighening the flywheel spins it up easier, but the normal weight then slows it down quicker, yes compression,big pistons does effect it massively. I have ridden me mates with a lightened flywheel and it does spin up quicker but it doesnt slow so good rolling off the throttle. Regarding the speedo being out in normal standard gearing at 4000 revs it was doing 70mph and at 5000 it was doing 90 mph, with the 43 tooth sprocket it was doing 75 at 4000 and 96 at 5000 revs, so about 5/6 mph out, i can live with that to be homest as i feel the bikes simply blasts out of the bends a lot better, my mates GSXR 750 was left for dead exiting bends together, he was doing about 13000 revs to get by
me on thursday. he did have me on the flat though!!
missing the noise, not the vibes. However never say never!
User avatar
Tweety
Posts: 466
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2013 10:47 am
Location: Skurup, Sweden

Re: 43 Tooth rear Sprocket

Post by Tweety »

bigtwinthing wrote:
7moore7 wrote:
Actually, lightening the flywheel increases engine braking. The flywheel is just rotational weight. So it will want to retain it's momentum more as it gets heavier. What this means is that if it is spinning at high speeds, it takes more energy to slow it down the heavier it gets. Similar trying to start or stop an empty merry-go-round versus one full of kids.

Engine braking comes from cylinder compression resistance (not flywheel weight). When this doesn't have to fight the momentum of the flywheel, it is even more noticeable.
hmmm i dont agree about the engine braking sorry, lighening the flywheel spins it up easier, but the normal weight then slows it down quicker, yes compression,big pistons does effect it massively. I have ridden me mates with a lightened flywheel and it does spin up quicker but it doesnt slow so good rolling off the throttle. Regarding the speedo being out in normal standard gearing at 4000 revs it was doing 70mph and at 5000 it was doing 90 mph, with the 43 tooth sprocket it was doing 75 at 4000 and 96 at 5000 revs, so about 5/6 mph out, i can live with that to be homest as i feel the bikes simply blasts out of the bends a lot better, my mates GSXR 750 was left for dead exiting bends together, he was doing about 13000 revs to get by
me on thursday. he did have me on the flat though!!
Well... You can argue that point all day... It makes no difference to the laws of physics, really... You really can't both eat the cake and still have it... Either the lessened rotational mass applies to the engine the same way both on acceleration and retardation, or it doesn't apply at all... Can't have one effect at one time, and another in another instance... Simply doesn't happen...

Either less mass makes the engine spin up quicker, and loose revs faster period... Then you have more engine braking... Or it doesn't...
Image <--- The result of OCMD... I gave up listing the mods in a sig line...
User avatar
sirch345
Site Admin
Posts: 21856
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2003 10:35 pm
Location: The West Country.

Re: 43 Tooth rear Sprocket

Post by sirch345 »

bigtwinthing wrote: wow i am inconsiderate, 2 up on a storm!!! thats the reason i bought it, i told my other half they dont have a seat for a pillion and quickly took the foot rests off!!! 2 teeth up on the back has worked a treat for my blast out of bends riding etc, and i can happily lose 10mph of the top end, The handle bar mod (all be it £90 has made a real difference too) the bike now for me is an absolute keeper and providing i never loose the "buzz" it offers i wont sell it. and thats whats owning a bike is all about. :biggrin
It sounds like you are a very happy man with the gearing change 8)

Chris.
User avatar
8541Hawk
Posts: 2066
Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2012 5:21 am
Location: Bella Vista, AR

Re: 43 Tooth rear Sprocket

Post by 8541Hawk »

bigtwinthing wrote:
Bloody hell you must be some rider if you can feel about 5mm longer on the wheelbase!!! and if your bike only makes power at 7000, i would take it back, lighening the flywheel will lose engine braking, which twins are meant to have. Are you sure you have not got a V Twin with 4 cylinders?

regards Paul.
Well Paul I am not really sure how to take your response so I will answer your questions and statements even though I do find your attitude a bit crusty.....

Yes I can feel the difference with the wheel base change. The front end "feels" more planted to me.
Now I do have to ask about people saying the have better "turn in" when shortening the wheel base with a 43T rear sprocket.
Isn't that "feeling" the 5mm difference in wheelbase? or are they just special also??

Can you please show me where I said my bike only makes power above 7K RPM?
I said maybe you should try running the bike there sometime if you believe you are low on power....... not because it has 4 cylinders but because you would at least be close to he HP & Torque peaks.
In case you don't have the numbers or a dyno sheet the peak torque is in the 7,800 RPM range and peak HP is around 8,700 RPM so it is quite simple....if you want max performance these are the speeds you need to spin the engine.
Many people I have encountered don't know what kind of power these bikes really make as they never rev the engine.
So go ahead and ride the poor thing like a tractor if you like but to really get performance from this engine you need to keep it between 7-9K as that is where the real power lives on just about any VTR.

As for engine braking, you are dead wrong. As stated in an earlier post, a lightened flywheel will give you increased engine braking as just as it is easier to spin up it is also easier for it to slow down.....simple physics.
Loud pipes don't save lives, knowing how to ride your bike will save your life.
User avatar
Jamoi
Posts: 5646
Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2013 2:28 pm
Location: South East England

Re: 43 Tooth rear Sprocket

Post by Jamoi »

I like the sound of having a snappier motor with increased engine braking :)

Will look into this mod

cheers
Jamie :wave:
User avatar
VTRDark
Posts: 20010
Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2012 9:24 pm

Re: 43 Tooth rear Sprocket

Post by VTRDark »

The Pros and Cons of Lightening the flywheel.
http://cbr250.com/forums/general-techni ... -cons.html

(:-})
==============================Enter the Darkside
User avatar
sirch345
Site Admin
Posts: 21856
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2003 10:35 pm
Location: The West Country.

Re: 43 Tooth rear Sprocket

Post by sirch345 »

Tweety wrote: You really can't both eat the cake and still have it...
I have found that to be very true :wink: :lol:

Chris.
User avatar
bigtwinthing
Posts: 5577
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2012 7:52 pm
Location: Hampshire

Re: 43 Tooth rear Sprocket

Post by bigtwinthing »

8541Hawk wrote:
bigtwinthing wrote:
Bloody hell you must be some rider if you can feel about 5mm longer on the wheelbase!!! and if your bike only makes power at 7000, i would take it back, lighening the flywheel will lose engine braking, which twins are meant to have. Are you sure you have not got a V Twin with 4 cylinders?

regards Paul.
Well Paul I am not really sure how to take your response so I will answer your questions and statements even though I do find your attitude a bit crusty.....

Yes I can feel the difference with the wheel base change. The front end "feels" more planted to me.
Now I do have to ask about people saying the have better "turn in" when shortening the wheel base with a 43T rear sprocket.
Isn't that "feeling" the 5mm difference in wheelbase? or are they just special also??

Can you please show me where I said my bike only makes power above 7K RPM?
I said maybe you should try running the bike there sometime if you believe you are low on power....... not because it has 4 cylinders but because you would at least be close to he HP & Torque peaks.
In case you don't have the numbers or a dyno sheet the peak torque is in the 7,800 RPM range and peak HP is around 8,700 RPM so it is quite simple....if you want max performance these are the speeds you need to spin the engine.
Many people I have encountered don't know what kind of power these bikes really make as they never rev the engine.
So go ahead and ride the poor thing like a tractor if you like but to really get performance from this engine you need to keep it between 7-9K as that is where the real power lives on just about any VTR.

As for engine braking, you are dead wrong. As stated in an earlier post, a lightened flywheel will give you increased engine braking as just as it is easier to spin up it is also easier for it to slow down.....simple physics.
sorry no arsy attitude intended, buy quite simply, i feel a 43 tooth sporockets does pick up better, and like i said i can happily loose 10mph off the top end. To be honest, if i did ride always at 7000 revs and needed that power i would buy an SP2 (133 ish bhp) i just think its a simple mod for £30 odd quid and noticed the difference straight away. i did get to the redline today on my trip to Silverstone (400 mile round trip)today and i was havong great fun, but in the New Forest where i live i have to cope with just blasting out of the corners most of the time. My R1 with the crossplane crank filled the (feel like a twin but still had top end poke quite happily when i had it).But still loving the storm. Apologies if i pissed you off. :D
missing the noise, not the vibes. However never say never!
Post Reply