what have you done to your "bike" today

General Biker Banter
User avatar
tankslappa
Posts: 333
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2012 9:57 pm
Location: Essex, UK

Re: what have you done to your "bike" today

Post by tankslappa »

cybercarl wrote:
bit of popping and banging though
Make sure there's no leaks at the header link to can, that will cause some popping and banging. just stick your hand over the outlet while it's running and have a feel around. Do it while the exhaust is cold so you don't burn yourself, but it will soon warm up. :thumbup:

(:-})
Time to loosen my links then ;-)
tony.mon
Posts: 16022
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 10:46 pm
Location: Norf Kent

Re: what have you done to your

Post by tony.mon »

cliveyandrews wrote:
I keep tinkering with ideas for a new set of down pipes - large bore right from port, to keep same diameter as link pipes.... balanced Yoshi stylie

:fart1:
Yes, but unless you also enlarge the outlet from the head it will still be restricted at that point.
If you have a look at the porting arrangement in the heads it leaves a lot to be desired. Only one ex valve lines up with the port itself, the other one is hidden away round two 90 degree bends.
I have a feeling that there is more power to be gained form opening the heads up than a large-bore pipe, tbh.
It's not falling off, it's an upgrade opportunity.
User avatar
tankslappa
Posts: 333
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2012 9:57 pm
Location: Essex, UK

Re: what have you done to your

Post by tankslappa »

tony.mon wrote:
cliveyandrews wrote:
I keep tinkering with ideas for a new set of down pipes - large bore right from port, to keep same diameter as link pipes.... balanced Yoshi stylie

:fart1:
Yes, but unless you also enlarge the outlet from the head it will still be restricted at that point.
If you have a look at the porting arrangement in the heads it leaves a lot to be desired. Only one ex valve lines up with the port itself, the other one is hidden away round two 90 degree bends.
I have a feeling that there is more power to be gained form opening the heads up than a large-bore pipe, tbh.
Hmmm.... Dremel time :biggrin
User avatar
VTRDark
Posts: 20010
Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2012 9:24 pm

Re: what have you done to your "bike" today

Post by VTRDark »

Had an interesting ride on the storm earlier today. Went over to my mates house to pick up a trolley jack in it's plastic container to remove the engine outa my fazer. Had dinner while I was round there so was stuffed. Managed to get the jack in my rucksack and onto my back with a helping hand. :lol:

Riding home the weight wasn't too much of a problem, but the height was. It was like having a pillion, and every time I braked it would bash me in the back of my head. I also could not sit as upright as I normally do, so I ended up resting my stomach across the tank like a full on sports bike and couldn't lift my head up much. What a laugh that was, I rode by the book, the traffic was against me and all the idiots were out to get me. Frustrating ride home and when I got back I had a stomach ache. But successfully transported a trolley jack on my back. :lol:

Lets hope the suns out tomorrow as I want that engine out.

(:-})
==============================Enter the Darkside
User avatar
agentpineapple
Posts: 15124
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2011 9:16 pm

Re: what have you done to your "bike" today

Post by agentpineapple »

you risk taker you :lol:
ride safe buddy, i'd hate to think what could happen :!:
HEY YOU GUYS!!!!!!
User avatar
VTRDark
Posts: 20010
Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2012 9:24 pm

Re: what have you done to your "bike" today

Post by VTRDark »

No risk mate, I rode by the book. Just bloody uncomfortable. :lol:

(:-})
==============================Enter the Darkside
User avatar
tankslappa
Posts: 333
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2012 9:57 pm
Location: Essex, UK

Re: what have you done to your "bike" today

Post by tankslappa »

I think we should have a thread for the oddest thing we've transported on our bikes.

I used to be a member of a local pub pool team, and I regularly used to transport my two part cue, in its hard transport case, strapped to the side of my CBR6 with a bungy. Oddest thing on the 'storm, well an i7 PC sounds pretty odd - Lucky it's a shuttle, so it actually fits in the tank bag!
User avatar
Superhawk Stu
Posts: 28
Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 8:39 pm
Location: Edinburgh
Contact:

what have you done to your "bike" today

Post by Superhawk Stu »

Washed it yesterday :) deepest joy!!
Image
Image
Image
Image


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
W: www.driversscotland.co.uk
E: info@driversscotland.co.uk
:) Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube
User avatar
agentpineapple
Posts: 15124
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2011 9:16 pm

Re: what have you done to your "bike" today

Post by agentpineapple »

very arty farty mate.
thats a clean looking bike indeed, you might want to sort out that front downpipe tho, its looking a wee bit scabby...... :lol:
loving the devil carbon cans tho..... :thumbup:
HEY YOU GUYS!!!!!!
User avatar
AMCQ46
Posts: 16589
Joined: Mon May 11, 2009 4:54 pm
Location: Worcestershire / Warwickshire border

Re: what have you done to your "bike" today

Post by AMCQ46 »

Is the last picture Arthers seat?................I studied in Edinburugh, but its been a long time since I was last there
AMcQ
User avatar
Superhawk Stu
Posts: 28
Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 8:39 pm
Location: Edinburgh
Contact:

what have you done to your "bike" today

Post by Superhawk Stu »

AMCQ46 wrote:Is the last picture Arthers seat?................I studied in Edinburugh, but its been a long time since I was last there
yes it is :)


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
W: www.driversscotland.co.uk
E: info@driversscotland.co.uk
:) Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube
tony.mon
Posts: 16022
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 10:46 pm
Location: Norf Kent

Re: what have you done to your

Post by tony.mon »

tankslappa wrote:
tony.mon wrote:
cliveyandrews wrote:
I keep tinkering with ideas for a new set of down pipes - large bore right from port, to keep same diameter as link pipes.... balanced Yoshi stylie

:fart1:
Yes, but unless you also enlarge the outlet from the head it will still be restricted at that point.
If you have a look at the porting arrangement in the heads it leaves a lot to be desired. Only one ex valve lines up with the port itself, the other one is hidden away round two 90 degree bends.
I have a feeling that there is more power to be gained form opening the heads up than a large-bore pipe, tbh.
Hmmm.... Dremel time :biggrin
Not quite that easy, you need to cut out and re-weld one of the exhaust studs and make the ports oval.
Then (because you've chopped into the coolant chamber) you need to seal that up as well, with enough material so that the exhaust gases won't boil the coolant but enough coolant will flow around the cylinder jacket.
Then make a short header with an oval profile to match the new port, and mate that with the downpipe. Both heads.
Then find an oval compressible copper O-ring to seal it.

Then it's Dyno Time!

(I've been considering and planning this mod for a while now......)
It's not falling off, it's an upgrade opportunity.
User avatar
cliveyandrews
Posts: 1041
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2009 9:01 pm
Location: Tamworth, Staffordshire
Contact:

Re: what have you done to your "bike" today

Post by cliveyandrews »

Surely, and I'm no expert here - even with a standard port, a bigger bore pipe will let the gasses flow much more freely - and certainly the loss of the siamese mess must help?

Now - next question - one for you physicists...

How would the bore diameter of the 2 link pipe affect things? i.e. there must be a link between the way the pipes balance, flow air etc - say no link pipe gives power, balanced gives torque but lost power (in a similar vein to the changes in velocity stack)...?
=====================================================

Image

Audi, Vide, Tace
aurantiacus tempestas es ocius

=====================================================
User avatar
lloydie
Posts: 20923
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 11:16 pm
Location: In the garage somewhere in Coventry

what have you done to your "bike" today

Post by lloydie »

The standard exhaust pipes are good right up to the rear splitter .
If you were to cut the rear splitter off and have it remade in a bigger pipe and to flow better . That would work better .
Have a look at some pics from my 2-1 project you will see what I mean .
tony.mon
Posts: 16022
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 10:46 pm
Location: Norf Kent

Re: what have you done to your "bike" today

Post by tony.mon »

There's a bit of a black art in this, but as far as I understand it:
The bore of the pipes isn't a restriction, it just makes the gas going through it go faster.
Same idea as holding your finger over the end of a running hosepipe, restrict the flow and the output jet is quicker.

So a bigger bore reduces the speed at which the gas travels along the pipe, which has the effect of making the pipe seem longer.
The scavenging wave travelling back up the pipe assists the gas to leave the cylinder efficiently, and so a larger amount of fresh, new charge can go in, meaning that the engine is able to burn more fuel/air and make more power.

Obviously there's a limit as to when the pipe's diameter becomes too large, and the link pipes help fool the system into thinking it's a better length than it actually is.
Remember that there is only one perfect engine speed (revs) that works for each pipe design, and so the art of adding link pipes is to replicate the effect at different rev speeds, too.

With a simple 1:1 pipe for each cylinder, not linked in any way, the cylinders would each make a peak power at a particular engine speed. But this point is a quite narrow band, with power drop-off's either side.
Now by combining the pipes in a Siamese or by using link pipes, you get other peak occurring elsewhere in the rev range, so that peak power is produce over a wider range of engine speeds, not just one point.

You know the phrase "on the cam" or "power band"? Pipe diameter and length have a big part to play in this.
Any two stroke tuners will know that!

Unfortunately there are also other variables,, not just bore diameter and length.
The transition between one diameter pipe and the next is important; curvature and bend radius, whether the pipes are mandrel-bent (still round when bent) or bent using a pipe-bender (slightly flattened in cross-section) is a factor (remember serpent headers?) length of can, etc, etc.

So there's no simple way to say that a pipe must be a particular length and diameter, and anything else will result in less power.

In the same way the intake stacks are a compromise between the perfect length for peak power at a certain engine speed.

And all of the other engine design characteristics also play a part, compression ratio, number of valves, head design, squish, etc, etc, etc.

But it's still the case that when a flow of air or gas is made to turn a tight radius it slows the gas flow and increases resonance, noise, heat, and produces disturbances in the Force, probably.
If you look into the exhaust port you will clearly see one valve directly in line with the exhaust port, but the other valve is hidden to one side.
So the head port design which allows one exhaust valve to flow it's gas straight down the open mouth of the tube, but tortures the other valve's gas through two 90 degree bends in the space of 75mm is surely going to produce gas disturbance at the ports; some effects will surely be felt at the "straight" exhaust valve, because the way the port is machined as standard the gas flow from the "obscured" port is effectively introduced at 90 degrees from the open mouth of the exhaust pipe, and also at 90 degrees to the "straight" valve.
The gas will try to flow both ways, as it can't go straight on.
Once the "straight" exhaust valve closes the gas from the "obscured" valve can only go down the mouth of the exhaust header, but up to that point it can also try to flow back into the open exhaust valve of it's twin.

Now it's possible that Honda have created this very deliberately, and messing with opening up the port into an oval shape will be detrimental; but I don't think this will be the case.

Only one way to find out, I suppose....

And the fair test would be to open the port into an oval shape, make a short header to adapt to a standard set of pipes, and compare dyno results before and after.

I'd want to do that before playing with exhaust pipe diameter and lengths, so as to isolate as far as possible just the effect of the opening up of the port. One thing at a time.

I have a set of heads set aside for this project, and have planned out what metal needs to be removed form the heads, and how to seal up the coolant chamber and fit a replacement stud. I've also been thinking about whether a better method of clamping the pipe onto the head might be possible- springs? maybe... Some other sort of clamp? Perhaps.... Haven't finally decided on that one as yet.

I'll be able to establish the oval section's dimensions once that's completed, and will then be able to fabricate the header adaptor. Then all I need is an oval O-ring.....no ideas on that yet, though.
I might just have to use a flexible exhaust sealant, or heatproof flexible O-ring/gasket, rather than a compressible copper one.

Making my head hurt, so I'm off to bed to think about this some more while I'm asleep.

In hindsight this might be better as a thread in it's own right, more as a joint consultative/planning project taking all ideas into account. I'll get round to it one day, though....
Apologies for thread hijack :oops:
But I haven't yet worked out how to
It's not falling off, it's an upgrade opportunity.
Post Reply