Mk1& Mk2 comparison

General Biker Banter
tony.mon
Posts: 16276
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 10:46 pm
Location: Norf Kent

Re: Mk1& Mk2 comparison

Post by tony.mon »

So, which do you prefer, the horrible blobby welding type of fairing brackets or the unfinished ones with sharp edges to scrape your paint over when taking the fairing on and off?

Weigh them!
It's not falling off, it's an upgrade opportunity.
User avatar
E.Marquez
Posts: 635
Joined: Wed May 30, 2012 1:27 pm

Re: Mk1& Mk2 comparison

Post by E.Marquez »

Thank you, do you know what year the change was?
VTRDark wrote: Mon Sep 04, 2017 9:03 pm Old
Image

New
Image
Marquez Motorcycle Services
Solutions to recurring maintenance
Race/Adventure ride event prep
Post event services

Total Rider
Your path to a TX motorcycle license
And advanced Rider training
User avatar
VTRDark
Posts: 20010
Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2012 9:24 pm

Re: Mk1& Mk2 comparison

Post by VTRDark »

Late 2001 onwards I believe the change was over here. Interestingly there was another change in the later later models...IIRC 2003 onwards and they decided to redo the colour on the Clutch and Generator cover from a dark Graphite to a Golden Bronze. Golden Bronze :lol: that don't sound right but I can't think of another way to describe it.
==============================Enter the Darkside
User avatar
Kev L
Posts: 11286
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 9:57 pm
Location: Hertford, England

Re: Mk1& Mk2 comparison

Post by Kev L »

VTRDark wrote: Thu Sep 07, 2017 11:59 am Late 2001 onwards I believe the change was over here. Interestingly there was another change in the later later models...IIRC 2003 onwards and they decided to redo the colour on the Clutch and Generator cover from a dark Graphite to a Golden Bronze. Golden Bronze :lol: that don't sound right but I can't think of another way to describe it.
F2 had black cases, bronze cases on F3.
Carpe diem, quam minimum credula postero
F3, 954 USD front, K Tech springs, Braced swinger, Ohlins shock, Six spoke Mockesini wheels, Harris rearsets, QaT, Flywheel diet!, A&L stacks, stick coils, K&N, FP Ti jets, Mori pipe's [colour]
User avatar
E.Marquez
Posts: 635
Joined: Wed May 30, 2012 1:27 pm

Re: Mk1& Mk2 comparison

Post by E.Marquez »

VTRDark wrote: Thu Sep 07, 2017 11:59 am Late 2001 onwards I believe the change was over here.
Perhaps it was a non US market change..
Both my 2001 and 1998 have the "early" aluminum ones as does the customer 2003 in the garage now.....
Marquez Motorcycle Services
Solutions to recurring maintenance
Race/Adventure ride event prep
Post event services

Total Rider
Your path to a TX motorcycle license
And advanced Rider training
jchesshyre
Posts: 590
Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2016 9:09 am
Location: Chester, Cheshire

Re: Mk1& Mk2 comparison

Post by jchesshyre »

There were a few carb changes in four stages in UK models, namely '97, '98-'00, '01-'04, and '05-'06, as follows:

'97: #45 pilots, needles A1UD front A1UC rear, carb ID VPT0B
'98-'00: #48 pilots, needles A1UD front A1UC rear, carb ID VPT0G
'01-'04: #45 pilots, needles A1UF front A1UE rear, carb ID VPT3A
'05-'06: #45 pilots, needles A1UF front A1UE rear, carb ID VPT3E

General consensus is that the A1UD/C needles are richer than the A1UF/E ones.

I don't know if these different carb ID numbers reflect any actual changes in anything integral like the needle jet or what.

Interestingly there are some different part numbers for the slide springs...

'97-'00: 16050-MBB-640
'01-'06: 16050-MBB-D41

However I don't know if a new part number always means a new part.

The specified idle speed changed as well (!):

'97: 1,100 ± 100 rpm
'98-'06: 1,200 ± 100 rpm
User avatar
podman
Posts: 597
Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2016 4:04 pm

Re: Mk1& Mk2 comparison

Post by podman »

Keep in mind they are all old-er bikes now, so which bike is the "better", excluding the bar and tank difference, will largely be down to how its been looked after and maintained over the last 12-20 years...id rather have a nice 1997 model than an abused and unloved 2005 one...
tony.mon
Posts: 16276
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 10:46 pm
Location: Norf Kent

Re: Mk1& Mk2 comparison

Post by tony.mon »

podman wrote: Wed Sep 13, 2017 4:59 pm Keep in mind they are all old-er bikes now, so which bike is the "better", excluding the bar and tank difference, will largely be down to how its been looked after and maintained over the last 12-20 years...id rather have a nice 1997 model than an abused and unloved 2005 one...
Possibly.
But the abusing is the fun bit.....
And respecting your bike in the morning is optional.
It won't even notice if you've forgotten it's name
It's not falling off, it's an upgrade opportunity.
Post Reply