Page 2 of 2
Posted: Thu Apr 06, 2006 8:22 am
by eddvtr1000

well ive been keeping my head down on this one folks
A/ i was half asleep when the interview was done(on nights)
B/ half the stuff that i remember aswering isnt in the article.
C/ i have been told by the missus(who works in media) that stuff i may or may not have said will be polished/omitted or otherwise to the editors discretion.

i realy didnt mean to make the bike sound as bad as the article makes out, all i did was point out some of the stuff that we regularly chat about on here.
and one more thing i didnt buy the vtr just coz it was in the shop, i bought it becuase ross verdon pointed it out to me after the missus said she was less than impressed with the quality of the paint on the rsvr. and she new ive allways liked vtr's.
right thats my whinge

can you lot forgive me?
Posted: Thu Apr 06, 2006 8:37 am
by sirch345
I think a better article could have been written about the storm, for a start they could have had at least half a dozen owners views not just 3.
But going by Eddie's post it look like they only print what they think people want to hear (you're forgiven Ed) so it would probably be a waste of time
Stu (Yellafella)
Malcolm Nash is the son of Carole, who own's Carole Nash Insurance..........so I think you've probably blown your chances of a good quote from them this year

but I understand what you mean

Posted: Thu Apr 06, 2006 8:44 am
by eddvtr1000
kaz all i can say is not all media types are git's coz i wouldnt be going out with one

but she did say the vast majority of them are git's.
the other thing is i plugged this site and they havent even mentioned that either.
Posted: Thu Apr 06, 2006 8:50 am
by eddvtr1000
Posted: Thu Apr 06, 2006 8:56 pm
by yellafella
sirch345 wrote:
Stu (Yellafella)
Malcolm Nash is the son of Carole, who own's Carole Nash Insurance..........so I think you've probably blown your chances of a good quote from them this year

but I understand what you mean

Carole Nash has never given me a decent quote yet !!! So i no longer even bother with them !!!!

Posted: Thu Apr 06, 2006 10:52 pm
by Fireman on a Storm
Posted: Fri Apr 07, 2006 8:24 am
by Pete.L
Now thats about one of the most sensable,fair and well thought out artical I've seen about the Storm.
Nice one Fireman
Pete.l
Posted: Fri Apr 07, 2006 8:27 am
by iggy1966
Pete.L wrote:Now thats about one of the most sensable,fair and well thought out artical I've seen about the Storm.
Nice one Fireman
Pete.l
Shhh Pete,
you know them Ozzies will get all smug saying things like that

Posted: Fri Apr 07, 2006 8:32 am
by Pete.L
Naa!
I'm sure there would have been an English editor involved in there somewhere. Their not that smart left to their own devices
Pete.l
Pete ducks and runs
Posted: Fri Apr 07, 2006 8:37 am
by iggy1966
Posted: Fri Apr 07, 2006 8:44 am
by sirch345
Posted: Fri Apr 07, 2006 10:44 am
by VTRgirl
Pete.L wrote:Naa!
I'm sure there would have been an English editor involved in there somewhere.
Their not that smart left to their own devices
Bwaaaaaahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!! You used the wrong word in a sentence about someone
else not being smart!!!!
I therefore request your comment, and all those which are along a similar theme, to be stricken from the record.
My case rests.
hehehehehehe, perhaps someone needs an Australian editor for their posts...
Posted: Mon Apr 10, 2006 5:46 am
by Sharpe1
VTRgirl wrote:Pete.L wrote:Naa!
I'm sure there would have been an English editor involved in there somewhere.
Their not that smart left to their own devices
Bwaaaaaahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!! You used the wrong word in a sentence about someone
else not being smart!!!!
I therefore request your comment, and all those which are along a similar theme, to be stricken from the record.
My case rests.
hehehehehehe, perhaps someone needs an Australian editor for their posts...
Hahahahahahahahahaha

Posted: Mon Apr 10, 2006 12:28 pm
by Pete.L