VTR1000.ORG

Oh what a sh1t storm this seems to be creating!

http://www.bnpmemberslist.co.uk/

P1ss easy to find on Google too.

If you're on there, hope you're keeping well.

The e-mails and replies are pretty bloody funny.

An ex school chum of mine is receiving quite a few phone calls and one or two e-mails, can't think why LOL.

Plonker joined when he was pissed 'allegedly' - I can now call in for a cuppa, and call him to let him know I'm coming LOL

HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAAHHAHAH

the very first letter in that link.. is awesome.....
and i quote

> Hello, good sir
>
> Please remove my details from youre website in the next day or else I will pursue legal action. I no liberel lefty traitors like are against free speech and you hate youre own culture, so this maight be a futile attempt, but I assure you the legal action will come.
>
> And BTW I used an alias, "David Binns" doesnt even exist, you plank, so jokes on youu!
>
> Regards
> David Mudkips (aka "David Binns" LOL)

if he is using fake details what does it matter if he is registered?
and if he has actually give his real name at the end this guy deserves a slap with a rubber donkey covered in marmite...

Or the map

http://bnpnearme.co.uk/

Interesting to see how many members are close to me.

Up to the individual I suppose.

TBH I think the whole fiasco is hilarious! Had some member (that has been named) on the local radio the other day arguing the publication of this list is a "fascist act" wtf?...

Dont agree with revealing details against a persons wish. If this was a list of Conservatives it would still be wrong to divulge personal details. BNP are not my bag at all but some are starting to believe in their policies.
The Australian immigration policy is similar to one the BNP believe in

It's not really revealing personal details...is it ...it's just names addresses and phone numbers , same as you'd get in the phone book or BT online ...unless you were ex-directory of course

If you're a member of an organisation ,why would you want to hide it , especially if it was a law abiding organisation


Few members will be bothered imo, just the ones in a certain line of employment which forbids them to be members , the rest wont be too fussed i would've thought.

no surprise here as the British press & Establishment Figures are obsessed with beating themselves up over racism and apologising for 200+ year old injustices
in truth GB is one of the most tolerant Nations on the planet, and your average white Brit is no more anti-black then yer average black is anti-white (based solely on personal experience of many years living in London, not hearsay).

how many white newsreaders, weather girls, actors etc have you seen on Asian or African TV? how many white politicians?
and another thing - next time the London Marathon or Great North Run is televised, once the paid professional runners have passed through - have a little game of spot the black charity runner - I've played for years & apart from a dozen or so celebs like Frank Bruno, Ainsley Harriot etc ain't seen one yet

I don't condone the BNP's policies but I can understand why some do, and I support their right to do so.

bikerpiker wrote:It's not really revealing personal details...is it ...it's just names addresses and phone numbers , same as you'd get in the phone book or BT online ...unless you were ex-directory of course

If you're a member of an organisation ,why would you want to hide it , especially if it was a law abiding organisation


Few members will be bothered imo, just the ones in a certain line of employment which forbids them to be members , the rest wont be too fussed i would've thought.

Agreed BP

We are supposed to live in a demacracy!!! surely we can follow, believe or practice what ever we like!!!!
Trouble is with this county today is if you are white you have to keep in line!!!!

Fcuk em thats what I say!!!

Jim.

bikerpiker wrote:Few members will be bothered imo, just the ones in a certain line of employment which forbids them to be members , the rest wont be too fussed i would've thought.

hmm couldn't disagree more tbh.
having your home address made freely available to those who would or could do you or your family harm (with anonymous impunity) is something to be VERY fussed about!

Depends how you look at it i suppose, .....but i mean..even the local Masonic Lodge members get there pics taken in the local rag,and it's supposed to be a secret society

Dont tell anyone



From a personal point of view ,if someone told me they were in the BNP my views towards them wouldnt change, i take people as i find them ,always have done

No black people in my work (500 employees),very few local ,so have no dealings with them, but when i got new windows fitted last year 2 brothers arrived to do the job, one was black one was white (dont ask, i didnt ), both were great lads and within half an hour it was like skin colour wasn't even noticeable

BP, although it is extremely easy to get hold of names addresses etc, as a member of an armed force I dont want my name, address, email and occupation publicised in an area that was not of my choosing. I have decided where and when i disclose info but only recently has it become acceptable (Certain Irish extremists amongst others made this an extremely dangerous game for much of the 90's) who you decide to vote for or support should,if you wish remain anonymous.

Theres freedom of speech then there is the freedom to publicise someone elses speech.

mmm the problem is a teacher/policeman/health worker drawn to the BNP would more than likely be, by definition, prejudiced of skin colour and race.

Would you mind if your kid was taught at school by a member of a pedophile ring? (as it surely doesn't matter what they do in their own free time....)

Timbo wrote: If one of my kids teachers was a member, so what?!! as long as he/she treated everyone in the class fairly and without prejudice regardless of skin colour or race, what is the problem?

Well at least it has shut them up about the recession we arent in Smile

strange how this happened, in the lefty press it was said that the list was made public by MI5 operatives, smacks of a smoke screen by this new labour/old tory sham of a government, to help us stop talking about the f**ked up econemy, and now worry that the country is full of racist nazi thugs, which is crap in my opinion, but a curtain Mr powel's statement seems to be getting more and more like fact than fiction,
carl

i dont think that all those on the 2007 member list joined cos they hate all none white people, i think a lot just joined because it seems to be the only party to put british born people first, and there are a lot of peed off people in the country who see none resident people getting bumped to the top of housing lists and those people who have waited years on the list get pushed out, wouldnt you be annoyed, and i could mention the NHS and none contributers getting full medical help when people wait months and years to see doctors, and then along comes a political party that listens to them and says they will put british interests at the front of their manifesto, its no wonder disgruntled people listen to the BNP, so i dont class those people as racist i would say desperate for help
carl