firestorm is not a sports bike

General Bike chat
h3r3t1c
Posts: 30
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2010 10:50 am

firestorm is not a sports bike

Post by h3r3t1c »

i believe and may offend in this statement that the firestorm is NOT a sports bike i don't know if anyone else agrees but i believe its more of a muscle bike like the speedtriple or gsx1400.

Discuss?
DON'T SUFFER FOOLS.... SHOOT 'EM

Suzuki GSX 750 F
Biamo Renagade
Suzuki VX800
Yamaha YZF600
Triumph T 595
Honda VF1000 F
Suzuki GSXR 750 WN
Yamaha RD 350 F2
Honda ST 1100
Kawasaki ZXR 750 L3
Honda VTR1000F
User avatar
benny hedges
Posts: 6110
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 5:09 pm
Location: Warrington

Re: firestorm is not a sports bike

Post by benny hedges »

depends what you term a sports bike imo...
your blades, gixxer1000, xz10r etc are usually known as supersports, and they definately earned the title.
anything you can put straight on the track out of the crate fits in that category.
the sp1/2 can still compete with the top supersports bikes...

so what is the firestorm?
it's definately a sporty bike when ridden aggressively, but then it can be ridden sedately as a commuter, yet i wouldn't say it's a tourer, due to the fact it's not the most comfy bike out there, isn't the best on fuel, wheelbase too short to carry luggage without pivoting lol, but ive been all over the place on mine with tent & ting, as have others :roll:
i think it's one of them machines that is a bit of everything, without being everything, if you know what i mean - bit of an all rounder...

i would say if you are doubting the storm's sporting capability, wind it up a bit, push it harder! :biggrin
You do not have to say anything. But it may harm your defence if you do not mention when posting something which you later rely on in quote. Anything you do say may be ripped to sh*t.
User avatar
BigVeeGrin
Posts: 2516
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 1:41 pm
Location: Glasgow

Re: firestorm is not a sports bike

Post by BigVeeGrin »

don't care what badge it has stuck on it - to me it's an absolute blinder and a gem and is a jolly good sport.
h3r3t1c
Posts: 30
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2010 10:50 am

Re: firestorm is not a sports bike

Post by h3r3t1c »

they are stunning but i just think they'd be closer to a speed triple than anything else i mean not even a bandit 1200 is as easy to hoik the front wheel up, and the sp's are nut bar track weapons. I just think honda missed the marketing ploy with it and would have sold more if they hadn't labelled it,
DON'T SUFFER FOOLS.... SHOOT 'EM

Suzuki GSX 750 F
Biamo Renagade
Suzuki VX800
Yamaha YZF600
Triumph T 595
Honda VF1000 F
Suzuki GSXR 750 WN
Yamaha RD 350 F2
Honda ST 1100
Kawasaki ZXR 750 L3
Honda VTR1000F
User avatar
VeeTeeArrrrrrr
Posts: 74
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2010 7:43 pm

Re: firestorm is not a sports bike

Post by VeeTeeArrrrrrr »

If I may put my side to it....its like a Audi S4 which is a cracking car compared to a Zonda which is the car equivalent to an R1. Both great but different classes of "Sport". :cool2 :Dancing2:
User avatar
AMCQ46
Posts: 16589
Joined: Mon May 11, 2009 4:54 pm
Location: Worcestershire / Warwickshire border

Re: firestorm is not a sports bike

Post by AMCQ46 »

veeteeArrrr, I think you are close with the car description, but my take is the Storm is more like a TVR.

Its all engine and noise, handleing can get a bit waward at the limits, its old tech, its outclassed by all the new stuff, its not that practical, but you smile everytime you ride it.

its not even what we used to call a UJM [universal Jap Motorcycle] as its not that comfortable, not that good with luggage, its and old school sportsbike

so, yes it is a sports bike, its not as fast as todays 600's but with the set up of suspension & brakes sorted [what Honda should have done if they wernt watching the cost].........on real roads they will have trouble keeping up with me, because I have the monster mid range :)
AMcQ
h3r3t1c
Posts: 30
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2010 10:50 am

Re: firestorm is not a sports bike

Post by h3r3t1c »

yeah the car description summed it up pretty well, and tbh its made me giggle like a school girl every time i ride her, anyway i fail to see why we need 185mph bikes in the real world i'd be happy to settle for 184.9mph :wink:
DON'T SUFFER FOOLS.... SHOOT 'EM

Suzuki GSX 750 F
Biamo Renagade
Suzuki VX800
Yamaha YZF600
Triumph T 595
Honda VF1000 F
Suzuki GSXR 750 WN
Yamaha RD 350 F2
Honda ST 1100
Kawasaki ZXR 750 L3
Honda VTR1000F
User avatar
VeeTeeArrrrrrr
Posts: 74
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2010 7:43 pm

Re: firestorm is not a sports bike

Post by VeeTeeArrrrrrr »

Funny I was going to use the TVR as the equal to the Storm, but I have serious issues with Heretic when its a well known fact that all the exitement with riding a fast bike is at the point between 184.9mph and 185mph thats the tenth where it all happens for me .............. :wink: :wink: :Behind 2: :Coke:
User avatar
Wicky
Posts: 7895
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2006 2:43 pm
Location: Colchester Essex
Contact:

Re: firestorm is not a sports bike

Post by Wicky »

The Storm is like the Toyota MR2 Mk1 - Nippily fast in red, sporty pretensions & mildly eccentric (like storm owners) ...
It may be that your whole purpose in life is simply to serve as a warning to others.

ImageVTR Firestorm and other bikes t-shirts
User avatar
benny hedges
Posts: 6110
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 5:09 pm
Location: Warrington

Re: firestorm is not a sports bike

Post by benny hedges »

Wicky wrote:The Storm is like the Toyota MR2 Mk1 ...
no it's not.
a mr2 has 4 wheels & a 4 cylinder engine.
a firestorm is more like a citroen 2cv which also has 2 cylinders, or a reliant robin which has 3 wheels
You do not have to say anything. But it may harm your defence if you do not mention when posting something which you later rely on in quote. Anything you do say may be ripped to sh*t.
h3r3t1c
Posts: 30
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2010 10:50 am

Re: firestorm is not a sports bike

Post by h3r3t1c »

:thumbup: i don't doubt its sporting edge, the storm has amazing acceleration and mid range (what a vtwin should have) i'd compare it more to a corvette z06 it has the acceleration and mid range with high speed handling issues due to basic suspension. I Love my storm its the best bike i've owned its the perfect road bike and with tweeks could be the best bike ever
DON'T SUFFER FOOLS.... SHOOT 'EM

Suzuki GSX 750 F
Biamo Renagade
Suzuki VX800
Yamaha YZF600
Triumph T 595
Honda VF1000 F
Suzuki GSXR 750 WN
Yamaha RD 350 F2
Honda ST 1100
Kawasaki ZXR 750 L3
Honda VTR1000F
h3r3t1c
Posts: 30
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2010 10:50 am

Re: firestorm is not a sports bike

Post by h3r3t1c »

yeah i think thats the next step to get the front end resprung and revalved, its next on the mod list purely because it will unleash my potential let alone the bikes. I think the tyres need doing aswell because there old d207's so a pair of avon storm ultra 2 will be ordered
DON'T SUFFER FOOLS.... SHOOT 'EM

Suzuki GSX 750 F
Biamo Renagade
Suzuki VX800
Yamaha YZF600
Triumph T 595
Honda VF1000 F
Suzuki GSXR 750 WN
Yamaha RD 350 F2
Honda ST 1100
Kawasaki ZXR 750 L3
Honda VTR1000F
User avatar
AMCQ46
Posts: 16589
Joined: Mon May 11, 2009 4:54 pm
Location: Worcestershire / Warwickshire border

Re: firestorm is not a sports bike

Post by AMCQ46 »

FirestormMike wrote:You need to try one that has had the suspension sorted. Probably a lot better mod than fannying about with the engine.
+1 on that.........bikes are all about corners...........as people who have ridden with me will know, I slow down when I get on the straight!
AMcQ
tony.mon
Posts: 16022
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 10:46 pm
Location: Norf Kent

Re: firestorm is not a sports bike

Post by tony.mon »

Dunno about that.
Whenever I've fallen off it's always been at a corner, hence my attraction for messing about on the drag strip!
Plus it's subjective; I can tell when I've gone .5 of a second quicker, but on the road the only thing I have to let me know I've gone quicker or slower round a bend is the speedo, and TBH if it's a good corner and I'm on it I don't have time to look....

Anyway, it's all about the rider, and their personal risk limits.
Example: at the summer meet-up, I had the slowest engine there; didn't have any trouble keeping up and making time in a reasonable manner :wink:
But up until recently; I was commuting and using the bike for work as well, and the experience of being on the Strom twenty or thirty thousand miles a year will always give you more feeling about limits, what you can get away with, what you can ride round and what gets in the way.
Example: Filtering skills honed on the M25 in rush hour every day in all weathers all year will usually mean that people who are used to these conditions will be more confident in traffic than those who just go out for a Sunday dry ride every so often.


Perhaps when they first came out they were sporty, but have since been superseded somewhat.
After all, Colin Edwards found them sporty enough at the time, as I recall?

But time moves on

When I was younger I recall the CB750 four coming out, serious crotch rocket at the time, but now nowhere near modern performance, speed, acceleration, brakes, handling, reliability, any of it.

And the VTR1000F is near-on a fifteen year old design now.
It's not falling off, it's an upgrade opportunity.
Beamish
Posts: 2862
Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2007 4:09 pm

Re: firestorm is not a sports bike

Post by Beamish »

It has a sporty stance and riding position but is relatively comfortable compared to the SP. My Gixxer will be classed as a sports tourer soon 8O after riding the latest litre Supersports it is slow , has shite brakes, soft suspension :lol: :lol: I wouldnt put the FS in the same league as a GSX or the Speed Triple. They are most definatley muscle bikes (well your neck will certainly be bigger after a year of ownership) :biggrin
I see myself as a sensitive intelligent man but with the heart of a clown that causes me to **ck things up right at that crucial moment........'Jim Morrison'
Post Reply