Page 1 of 1
Voting for least progress on a project since records began
Posted: Tue Dec 26, 2017 11:26 pm
by AMCQ46
only 1 choice on this one and voting closes at midnight on 1st
Re: Voting for least progress on a project since records began
Posted: Wed Dec 27, 2017 9:18 am
by Pete.L
Bazza's Invisible Storm
Its been going on for so long I'd forgotten all about that. I thought it was just a myth to be talked about at bike meets
Re: Voting for least progress on a project since records began
Posted: Thu Dec 28, 2017 7:15 pm
by Flatline
Oh for heavens sake, it's only 5 years..............Nuclear power stations take about 10 years
Re: Voting for least progress on a project since records began
Posted: Thu Dec 28, 2017 8:25 pm
by MacV2
Flatline wrote: ↑Thu Dec 28, 2017 7:15 pm
Oh for heavens sake, it's only 5 years..............Nuclear power stations take about 10 years
Ahmmm. The date on this...
viewtopic.php?f=30&t=21082&hilit=ducafe#p170744 ...says Tue Sep 13, 2011 7:53 pm
That 6 years, 3 months, 15 days 31mins... That poor time keeping may have something to do with the late running...
Re: Voting for least progress on a project since records began
Posted: Thu Dec 28, 2017 9:04 pm
by fabiostar
MacV2 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 28, 2017 8:25 pm
Flatline wrote: ↑Thu Dec 28, 2017 7:15 pm
Oh for heavens sake, it's only 5 years..............Nuclear power stations take about 10 years
Ahmmm. The date on this...
viewtopic.php?f=30&t=21082&hilit=ducafe#p170744 ...says Tue Sep 13, 2011 7:53 pm
That 6 years, 3 months, 15 days 31mins... That poor time keeping may have something to do with the late running...
is it true the Titanic was designed,build and sunk in half the time????