MCN Review.
Posted: Wed Apr 05, 2006 10:56 am
For those of you who haven't seen it here's the article some folk have been refering to.
Page 1 of 2
Posted: Wed Apr 05, 2006 11:33 am
You are star! Can't buy MCN here - thanks a lot!
Posted: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:22 pm
Nice one Kev
Thanks
Pete.l
Thanks
Pete.l
Posted: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:31 pm
ahhh beat me to it m8
Posted: Wed Apr 05, 2006 1:24 pm
Brilliant stuff.
Cheers
Cheers
Posted: Wed Apr 05, 2006 1:29 pm
Marty you said your scanner was knackered so i jumped in to save the day 
Posted: Wed Apr 05, 2006 1:40 pm
Is that VTRvicky I see??? swopping her storm for a Buell!!!!!
Must have been put off meeting us lot in the lakes
good wirte up though
Must have been put off meeting us lot in the lakes
good wirte up though
Posted: Wed Apr 05, 2006 10:22 pm
Who's that w**ker Malcolm ?
2000 miles in 5 years ? So that makes him an authority on Storms then does it ? TIT !!!!
And wehat a poser !! 2000 miles and a Nastro paintjob too !!! TOPTIT !!!
2000 miles in 5 years ? So that makes him an authority on Storms then does it ? TIT !!!!
And wehat a poser !! 2000 miles and a Nastro paintjob too !!! TOPTIT !!!
Posted: Wed Apr 05, 2006 11:24 pm
Well said yellafella! 
Posted: Thu Apr 06, 2006 8:22 am
well ive been keeping my head down on this one folks A/ i was half asleep when the interview was done(on nights)
B/ half the stuff that i remember aswering isnt in the article.
C/ i have been told by the missus(who works in media) that stuff i may or may not have said will be polished/omitted or otherwise to the editors discretion.
i realy didnt mean to make the bike sound as bad as the article makes out, all i did was point out some of the stuff that we regularly chat about on here.
and one more thing i didnt buy the vtr just coz it was in the shop, i bought it becuase ross verdon pointed it out to me after the missus said she was less than impressed with the quality of the paint on the rsvr. and she new ive allways liked vtr's.
right thats my whinge
can you lot forgive me?Posted: Thu Apr 06, 2006 8:37 am
I think a better article could have been written about the storm, for a start they could have had at least half a dozen owners views not just 3.
But going by Eddie's post it look like they only print what they think people want to hear (you're forgiven Ed) so it would probably be a waste of time
Stu (Yellafella)
Malcolm Nash is the son of Carole, who own's Carole Nash Insurance..........so I think you've probably blown your chances of a good quote from them this year but I understand what you mean
But going by Eddie's post it look like they only print what they think people want to hear (you're forgiven Ed) so it would probably be a waste of time
Stu (Yellafella)
Malcolm Nash is the son of Carole, who own's Carole Nash Insurance..........so I think you've probably blown your chances of a good quote from them this year
but I understand what you mean Posted: Thu Apr 06, 2006 8:44 am
kaz all i can say is not all media types are git's coz i wouldnt be going out with one but she did say the vast majority of them are git's.
the other thing is i plugged this site and they havent even mentioned that either.
but she did say the vast majority of them are git's.the other thing is i plugged this site and they havent even mentioned that either.
Posted: Thu Apr 06, 2006 8:50 am
Posted: Thu Apr 06, 2006 8:56 pm
Carole Nash has never given me a decent quote yet !!! So i no longer even bother with them !!!!sirch345 wrote:
Stu (Yellafella)
Malcolm Nash is the son of Carole, who own's Carole Nash Insurance..........so I think you've probably blown your chances of a good quote from them this year
Posted: Thu Apr 06, 2006 10:52 pm
Look here for a better write up, off the oz sight
http://www.rednail.com.au/ozfs/docs/Fir ... stTest.pdf
http://www.rednail.com.au/ozfs/docs/Fir ... stTest.pdf