He's at it again!
Posted: Thu Oct 19, 2006 3:02 pm
Chief Constable Richard Brunstrom has gone a step further by posting a video of speeding bikes onto his blog
This has been published by the BBC and I've posted a hyperlink to it
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/north_west/6066426.stm
Given that the helicopter costs in excess of £400 p/h without the costs of crewing it, is it really a proportionate response to two people speeding on bikes?
Were the three cars that were allegedly "undertaken" also prosecuted under s.3 of the Road Traffic Act for careless and inconsiderate driving. IT can be seen that those cars are clearly in lane 2 of a dual carriageway and are not overtaking. They are travelling at a constant speed and are equidistant from each other. They are blocking a lane when there is no need. This would not allow the motorcyclists to overtake legally. There is a load of past-decided cases in relation to this issue.
I feel that Mr Brunstrom's attack on bikers is somewhat of a personal one and that when bikers defend themselves it borders on hysteria. These comments are qualitative and subjective and have absolutely no evidence - something the police tend to need.
Your thoughts?
This has been published by the BBC and I've posted a hyperlink to it
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/north_west/6066426.stm
Given that the helicopter costs in excess of £400 p/h without the costs of crewing it, is it really a proportionate response to two people speeding on bikes?
Were the three cars that were allegedly "undertaken" also prosecuted under s.3 of the Road Traffic Act for careless and inconsiderate driving. IT can be seen that those cars are clearly in lane 2 of a dual carriageway and are not overtaking. They are travelling at a constant speed and are equidistant from each other. They are blocking a lane when there is no need. This would not allow the motorcyclists to overtake legally. There is a load of past-decided cases in relation to this issue.
I feel that Mr Brunstrom's attack on bikers is somewhat of a personal one and that when bikers defend themselves it borders on hysteria. These comments are qualitative and subjective and have absolutely no evidence - something the police tend to need.
Your thoughts?