Subframe rebuild Aluminum or Carbon fibre?

Need advice on which oil to use or which tyre best suits you? Share your topic and get help here.
Post Reply
satanzhand
Posts: 42
Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2008 7:30 am
Location: new zealand

Subframe rebuild Aluminum or Carbon fibre?

Post by satanzhand »

Hi,

I am just looking at lightening and lifting the butt on my VTR.

I was thinking of doing a carbon fibre rear subframe, but the lack of information available about the strength etc. puts me off the idea now, even though I think I would be super cool.

So I'm looking at constructing a subframe out of old faithful Aluminum...anyone have any thoughts or Knowledge about the subject?
User avatar
warby221
Posts: 866
Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2007 7:42 pm
Location: lancs

Re: Subframe rebuild Aluminum or Carbon fibre?

Post by warby221 »

Strength for weight ally and steel are about the same IE for a given strength of steel box section you would need a thicker wall section of aluminium for the same strength that’s why ducati use a steel truss frame. Carbon fibre is lighter and stronger than steel but can shatter that’s why they banned CF tanks from racing
If your only looking for the bling factor why not rap the original steel sub frame in carbon fibre
Image
its big----- its red ------its throbbing and it’s a thousand CC
satanzhand
Posts: 42
Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2008 7:30 am
Location: new zealand

Re: Subframe rebuild Aluminum or Carbon fibre?

Post by satanzhand »

I have order some solid aluminum bar stock now which I'm going to fashion a new subframe with...and then I'm planning on just drilling out the unwanted weight. I'm hoping to bend the lower sub-bar so its almost not visible...but ill have to see how the Al handles the bend.

The main purpose of the subframe change has really become changing the look of the rear with out changing the tail dressing e.g. lifting the butt. I've gone this route because I didnt want to change the rear shock with a lift as it screws up the suspension ride.
User avatar
sirch345
Site Admin
Posts: 21856
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2003 10:35 pm
Location: The West Country.

Re: Subframe rebuild Aluminum or Carbon fibre?

Post by sirch345 »

Be careful what you are doing :!:

The early Hayabusa had problems with the rear sub-frame cracking or breaking. They replaced the alloy one with a new steel version. Iirc it was owners who carried a pillion and/or panniers full of luggage that this weakness showed up :!:

Chris.
User avatar
Zakalwe
Posts: 567
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2006 12:22 pm
Location: Lancaster

Re: Subframe rebuild Aluminum or Carbon fibre?

Post by Zakalwe »

sirch345 wrote:Be careful what you are doing :!:

The early Hayabusa had problems with the rear sub-frame cracking or breaking. They replaced the alloy one with a new steel version. Iirc it was owners who carried a pillion and/or panniers full of luggage that this weakness showed up :!:

Chris.
IIRC ithe subframe on busas cracked where owners had changed the exhaust cans. The end cans on the early busas were a structural member supporting the rear subframe
Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem
User avatar
sirch345
Site Admin
Posts: 21856
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2003 10:35 pm
Location: The West Country.

Re: Subframe rebuild Aluminum or Carbon fibre?

Post by sirch345 »

Zakalwe wrote:
sirch345 wrote:Be careful what you are doing :!:

The early Hayabusa had problems with the rear sub-frame cracking or breaking. They replaced the alloy one with a new steel version. Iirc it was owners who carried a pillion and/or panniers full of luggage that this weakness showed up :!:

Chris.
IIRC ithe subframe on busas cracked where owners had changed the exhaust cans. The end cans on the early busas were a structural member supporting the rear subframe
You could well be right on that Zakalwe, it certainly sounds feasible.

Chris.
User avatar
Zakalwe
Posts: 567
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2006 12:22 pm
Location: Lancaster

Re: Subframe rebuild Aluminum or Carbon fibre?

Post by Zakalwe »

sirch345 wrote:
Zakalwe wrote: IIRC ithe subframe on busas cracked where owners had changed the exhaust cans. The end cans on the early busas were a structural member supporting the rear subframe
You could well be right on that Zakalwe, it certainly sounds feasible.

Chris.
Suzuki seem to have a history with their bikes breaking up.....you heard about the recall on the K5s?
Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem
User avatar
sirch345
Site Admin
Posts: 21856
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2003 10:35 pm
Location: The West Country.

Re: Subframe rebuild Aluminum or Carbon fibre?

Post by sirch345 »

Zakalwe wrote: Suzuki seem to have a history with their bikes breaking up.....you heard about the recall on the K5s?
No I can't say that I have. What was that all about :?:

Chris.
User avatar
Zakalwe
Posts: 567
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2006 12:22 pm
Location: Lancaster

Re: Subframe rebuild Aluminum or Carbon fibre?

Post by Zakalwe »

sirch345 wrote:
Zakalwe wrote: Suzuki seem to have a history with their bikes breaking up.....you heard about the recall on the K5s?
No I can't say that I have. What was that all about :?:

Chris.
Suzuki GB have issued a full recall (via VOSA) to have all K5 1000s returned to have a frame brace glued on. There have been a couple of cases where the frames have cracked at the headstock (when I say cracked, I mean the front has fallen off)...allegedly after an accident or wheelies.....
Details here

Image
( A K5 after a 30MPH collision)



And another one:
Image
Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem
User avatar
firestorm996
Posts: 617
Joined: Tue Jul 16, 2002 10:15 am
Location: Oop North
Contact:

Re: Subframe rebuild Aluminum or Carbon fibre?

Post by firestorm996 »

Jeez, the K5 pics are scary 8O 8O 8O 8O :o :o

Regarding the subframe...if you're gonna go the ally route, you might be best keeping it as a single seater. The only ally subframes I've seen have been built for racing. They were made from hollow section ally and welded with a bit of cross bracing.
Firestorm996
'98 VTR in black - road whore - track bitch
User avatar
sirch345
Site Admin
Posts: 21856
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2003 10:35 pm
Location: The West Country.

Re: Subframe rebuild Aluminum or Carbon fibre?

Post by sirch345 »

Zakalwe wrote:
sirch345 wrote:
Zakalwe wrote: Suzuki seem to have a history with their bikes breaking up.....you heard about the recall on the K5s?
No I can't say that I have. What was that all about :?:

Chris.
Suzuki GB have issued a full recall (via VOSA) to have all K5 1000s returned to have a frame brace glued on. There have been a couple of cases where the frames have cracked at the headstock (when I say cracked, I mean the front has fallen off)...allegedly after an accident or wheelies.....
Details here

Image
( A K5 after a 30MPH collision)



And another one:
Image
That is scary :!: 8O 8O

Chris.
tony.mon
Posts: 16022
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 10:46 pm
Location: Norf Kent

Re: Subframe rebuild Aluminum or Carbon fibre?

Post by tony.mon »

[quote="satanzhand"]Hi,

I am just looking at lightening and lifting the butt on my VTR.

quote]

K5 pix scary, right enough, but at least in the first one the butt's lifted :D
It's not falling off, it's an upgrade opportunity.
User avatar
LotusSevenMan
Posts: 1915
Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 8:32 pm
Location: Liss, Hampshire. UK

Re: Subframe rebuild Aluminum or Carbon fibre?

Post by LotusSevenMan »

Best to lighten ones own butt I'd have thought! Safer eh?
"Only ride as fast as your guardian angel can fly" !!!
satanzhand
Posts: 42
Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2008 7:30 am
Location: new zealand

Re: Subframe rebuild Aluminum or Carbon fibre?

Post by satanzhand »

I will be keeping the bike as single seater. Its a pretty basic job.. doesn't even need much bending just a little tig'ing.
Post Reply