CCT Failure Survey

Need advice on which oil to use or which tyre best suits you? Share your topic and get help here.
colin_linz
Posts: 10
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 2:18 am

CCT Failure Survey

Post by colin_linz »

Hi Guys, I don't post much over this way, I usually hang out at the ozfirestorm bulletin board. I'm currently trying to build some data on Cam Chain Tensioner failures. To do this I have a short 10 question online survey that I hope to get VTR ridders to complete. The survey is for all VTR riders (F, SP1, SP2), and regardless of experiencing a CCT failure or not. The link to the survey is http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/VH7RB8R

Thanks
Col
Cheers
Colin
User avatar
Pete.L
Forum Health And Safety Officer
Posts: 7228
Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2003 5:09 pm
Location: Bristol

Re: CCT Failure Survey

Post by Pete.L »

Haven't heard of many SP1 or 2 failures. I think it's only the F model that goes, maybe you should look into converting a SP tensioner to a firestorm one? :D

Pete.l
My new ride is a bit of a Howler and I love to make her Squeal
User avatar
bazza696
Posts: 1981
Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 12:54 pm
Location: Witham, Essex

Re: CCT Failure Survey

Post by bazza696 »

You will struggle with converting to an SP tensioner Dr they are hear driven cams. View don't need them, I believe that the cbr1100xx blackbird has the same tensioner and the same problem as the storm.
Image
colin_linz
Posts: 10
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 2:18 am

Re: CCT Failure Survey

Post by colin_linz »

I had a bit of a brain fart when I put the survey together and forgot all about the SP's gear driven cams. The survey has been changed now.

Interestingly the same tensioners are used in a number of models, even the new moto2 engines seem to use them.

Image
Last edited by colin_linz on Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Cheers
Colin
User avatar
marlbororman
Posts: 673
Joined: Tue Aug 29, 2006 2:29 pm
Location: Hull

Re: CCT Failure Survey

Post by marlbororman »

early blades have the same one too, was looking at my mates 94 blade and its identical :) (he has started to hear noises)
User avatar
benny hedges
Posts: 6110
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 5:09 pm
Location: Warrington

Re: CCT Failure Survey

Post by benny hedges »

Pete.L wrote:Haven't heard of many SP1 or 2 failures. I think it's only the F model that goes, maybe you should look into converting a SP tensioner to a firestorm one? :D

Pete.l
i think it would be easier to use the ccts off a cr500 :whatever

re the survey - mine didn't fail but due to my riding style i thought it best to rip the oem ones out and put solids in before they took the knock.
You do not have to say anything. But it may harm your defence if you do not mention when posting something which you later rely on in quote. Anything you do say may be ripped to sh*t.
User avatar
Pete.L
Forum Health And Safety Officer
Posts: 7228
Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2003 5:09 pm
Location: Bristol

Re: CCT Failure Survey

Post by Pete.L »

benny hedges wrote:
Pete.L wrote:Haven't heard of many SP1 or 2 failures. I think it's only the F model that goes, maybe you should look into converting a SP tensioner to a firestorm one? :D

Pete.l
i think it would be easier to use the ccts off a cr500 :whatever

re the survey - mine didn't fail but due to my riding style i thought it best to rip the oem ones out and put solids in before they took the knock.
So when is someone going to invent a solid one with 1/4 inch of play (spring loading)in them so it can adsorb the different tensions required through out the rev range?
Surely that's got to be the way forward??

Oh, still can't find the tensioner on my bike...think it might have fell off 8O

Pete.l
My new ride is a bit of a Howler and I love to make her Squeal
User avatar
benny hedges
Posts: 6110
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 5:09 pm
Location: Warrington

Re: CCT Failure Survey

Post by benny hedges »

hydraulic driven cams is the future imo.
i had a brainwave invention once - like a chain & sprocket, but instead a small hydraulic pump driving a larger one, connected by stainless / flexible pipework....
i even bought some to experiment with - for a final drive it would be totally maintenance free, even variable ratios with an adjustable pressure relief valve feeding into a sump....
put a little air into it for a cush drive.

thought of designing an aftermarket bolt-on set to replace conventional drives...
then i found out that peugot invented it in 1904 :lol: the viscuous coupling they called it (or probably le coupling viscuousse)
i was miffed. :problem:

but imagine that for cam drive - a star shaped rotor driven by the same on the crank, nothing to break... virtually loss free and silent, no rattles, no wear!
You do not have to say anything. But it may harm your defence if you do not mention when posting something which you later rely on in quote. Anything you do say may be ripped to sh*t.
colin_linz
Posts: 10
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 2:18 am

Re: CCT Failure Survey

Post by colin_linz »

Or, valves opened and closed by rare earth magnet voice coils. You could then vary the duration and lift of the valve. At the moment Evinrude are using this technology in their two stroke direct injection outboards. In this case they use the voice coil as an injector. It not only opens and closes like conventional injectors, but varies its stroke and creates a varied injection pressure to optimise the injected plume. They are capable of pressurising the fuel to 600psi.
Cheers
Colin
colin_linz
Posts: 10
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 2:18 am

Re: CCT Failure Survey

Post by colin_linz »

I've attached a pdf of the survey results as they are at the moment. There are only 66 respondents, but the survey will be kept as a live document, so we will see what happens. The results seem to have settled into some consistency, I don't think there will be any great changes. Thanks to you guys that took the time to respond to the survey. I had good responses from here, Aust, and the US.

Here is a link to the pdf if you want to see it. http://tinyurl.com/24h7pd8
Cheers
Colin
IgorVigor
Posts: 139
Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2009 1:49 pm
Location: Cornwall

Re: CCT Failure Survey

Post by IgorVigor »

benny hedges wrote:hydraulic driven cams is the future imo.
i had a brainwave invention once - like a chain & sprocket, but instead a small hydraulic pump driving a larger one, connected by stainless / flexible pipework....
i even bought some to experiment with - for a final drive it would be totally maintenance free, even variable ratios with an adjustable pressure relief valve feeding into a sump....
put a little air into it for a cush drive.

thought of designing an aftermarket bolt-on set to replace conventional drives...
then i found out that peugot invented it in 1904 :lol: the viscuous coupling they called it (or probably le coupling viscuousse)
i was miffed. :problem:

but imagine that for cam drive - a star shaped rotor driven by the same on the crank, nothing to break... virtually loss free and silent, no rattles, no wear!
And its now similar to hydrostatic drive :S

I am sure I have seen bikes with hydraulic cams :S
havent the latest ducati's or aprillia (motogp perhaps?) using them?

I must admit, I think one day I will upgrade from the Firestorm to an SP1/SP2 :)
colin_linz
Posts: 10
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 2:18 am

Re: CCT Failure Survey

Post by colin_linz »

This will be the final update. I have reached my 100 respondent limit for free access. The survey will be kept live. I may at a future date fork out some money for further results if the responses are there. I haven't drawn any conclusions, just included the questions and data. You can draw your own. Thanks to those of you that responded. I think a 100 is a meaningful size and some clear trends observable.

http://tinyurl.com/22n6mzj
Cheers
Colin
User avatar
benny hedges
Posts: 6110
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 5:09 pm
Location: Warrington

Re: CCT Failure Survey

Post by benny hedges »

colin_linz wrote: I haven't drawn any conclusions
i have.
they break and wreck your head - in many ways.
prevention is better than cure.
avoid the inevitable and you have a good solid reliable bike, nothing much else mechanical goes wrong :thumbup:
You do not have to say anything. But it may harm your defence if you do not mention when posting something which you later rely on in quote. Anything you do say may be ripped to sh*t.
colin_linz
Posts: 10
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 2:18 am

Re: CCT Failure Survey

Post by colin_linz »

The rate of failure isn't good that's for sure. I'm still happy enough to leave mine as they are though. At 80'000klm so fare without a problem, I'm curious to see how much longer they will last.
Cheers
Colin
User avatar
benny hedges
Posts: 6110
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 5:09 pm
Location: Warrington

Re: CCT Failure Survey

Post by benny hedges »

colin_linz wrote: At 80'000klm so fare without a problem, I'm curious to see how much longer they will last
well tbh i think you will kick your own ass when they fail, especially seeing as you've looked at the stats and are aware of the failure rate.
the least you should do is replace the old ones with new oem ccts.
the ones you have are expired and imo could fail anytime, but will probably wait until you are miles away from home or really need the bike to impress some local munter.

it's like knowing your tyre is down to the string but leaving it to see what happens when it bursts...
or ignoring the fuel light...
or touching cloth and squeezing it back in... :roll:
You do not have to say anything. But it may harm your defence if you do not mention when posting something which you later rely on in quote. Anything you do say may be ripped to sh*t.
Post Reply