http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/130738926966? ... 608wt_1139
bidded so hope i win now
would you blingy bit
would you blingy bit
would you blingy bit
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/130738926966? ... 608wt_1139
bidded so hope i win now
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/130738926966? ... 608wt_1139
bidded so hope i win now
Ill never be a sell out storm forever
Re: would you blingy bit
how come its not symetrical? or is that packaging?
3 out of 4 people make up 75% of the worlds population.
Re: would you blingy bit
not to my taste as I'm not a fan of chrome or shiny metals but can see the appeal
good luck with the bid
good luck with the bid
ヨシムラ
MOT - 10/04/2015
TAX - 30/11/14
INSURANCE - MCE - Expires 12/04/2015 (Midnight)
ACCIDENT CALL - 0871 2227910
RAC - 0800 1977830 - 03_MCECAB90013033
MOT - 10/04/2015
TAX - 30/11/14
INSURANCE - MCE - Expires 12/04/2015 (Midnight)
ACCIDENT CALL - 0871 2227910
RAC - 0800 1977830 - 03_MCECAB90013033
Re: would you blingy bit
You do like a bit of chrome mate, too much cleaning! What am I saying, that is your ting innit bruv! Good luck with the auction.
Carpe diem, quam minimum credula postero
F3, 954 USD front, K Tech springs, Braced swinger, Ohlins shock, Six spoke Mockesini wheels, Harris rearsets, QaT, Flywheel diet!, A&L stacks, stick coils, K&N, FP Ti jets, Mori pipe's [colour]
F3, 954 USD front, K Tech springs, Braced swinger, Ohlins shock, Six spoke Mockesini wheels, Harris rearsets, QaT, Flywheel diet!, A&L stacks, stick coils, K&N, FP Ti jets, Mori pipe's [colour]
Re: would you blingy bit
It's not symmetrical, but neither is the standard plastic one this replaces.lumpyv wrote:how come its not symetrical? or is that packaging?
It's shaped that way to protect the shock but not hide the rear downpipe.
It's not falling off, it's an upgrade opportunity.
Re: would you blingy bit
ah-ha i guess it dosen,t go where i originally thought it didtony.mon wrote:It's not symmetrical, but neither is the standard plastic one this replaces.lumpyv wrote:how come its not symetrical? or is that packaging?
It's shaped that way to protect the shock but not hide the rear downpipe.
3 out of 4 people make up 75% of the worlds population.
Re: would you blingy bit
That's where I decided it's meant to go. The only problem I can see is that the standard one iirc makes contact with the swingarm. If this one does the same (I appreciate it may be slightly different so that doesn't happen) it will be metal rubbing against metal as the swingarm moves up and down.tony.mon wrote: It's not symmetrical, but neither is the standard plastic one this replaces.
It's shaped that way to protect the shock but not hide the rear downpipe.
Chric, your bike has a hugger fitted. Normally going on you remove that shock protector when you fit a hugger.
Chris.
Re: would you blingy bit
cheers did not think of that so canceld bidsirch345 wrote:That's where I decided it's meant to go. The only problem I can see is that the standard one iirc makes contact with the swingarm. If this one does the same (I appreciate it may be slightly different so that doesn't happen) it will be metal rubbing against metal as the swingarm moves up and down.tony.mon wrote: It's not symmetrical, but neither is the standard plastic one this replaces.
It's shaped that way to protect the shock but not hide the rear downpipe.
Chric, your bike has a hugger fitted. Normally going on you remove that shock protector when you fit a hugger.
Chris.
Ill never be a sell out storm forever
Re: would you blingy bit
And just to confirm the standard plastic one does make contact with the swingarm. I looked this afternoon at the one removed from my bike, it definitely has rub marks on it from the arm,chric wrote: cheers did not think of that so canceld bid
Chris.