I wasnt going to mention names.
Yes it's still the same problem.
What I fail to understand is.
1, If hes a specialist in these bike, he should have known that bolts would be corroded and seized om a bike of this age.
2. If theBike was as he puts it In a poor condition , then why proceed and repair the engine and complain about the condition of the Bike afterwards.
3, The only he's being funny is that I complained about the extra £400 pound and that he looked at the rear linkage with out me asking him to do. But then why claim extra money and moan when I confront him about doing and charging me for additional work that the bike wasnt there for in the first place. I also, explained that when the bikearrived back it was scratched in places.
4 , Why would any one complete 20 dyno runs on a bike that has just had new shells and bearing in the engine. How come the engine in now in a worse condition that it was before it went. At least it could have still been ridden it as it was , But now due to the severe vibration that can be felt through the whole bike, and along with the right exhaust sounding perthetic and severe rumbling and rattling of the right side of the engine tells me there is some thing seriously wrong with the engine and that it makes the the bike unrideable.
I feel that a lot of people on here will side with him, but your not the ones with a wombles up bike and 1400quid short. I was going to trade it in beforte talking to roger for a VFR but its that bad now, Any one will know the engine is knackered.
At present he has put the ball back in my court by saying that he will refuse to have the bike back if it's in the same condition as before "
If you do decide to return the bike to me for the evaluation of the cause and assessment of the cost of any repairs" he commenced the repairs.
