Voting for least progress on a project since records began
Voting for least progress on a project since records began
only 1 choice on this one and voting closes at midnight on 1st
AMcQ
- Pete.L
- Forum Health And Safety Officer
- Posts: 7302
- Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2003 5:09 pm
- Location: Bristol
Re: Voting for least progress on a project since records began
Bazza's Invisible Storm
Its been going on for so long I'd forgotten all about that. I thought it was just a myth to be talked about at bike meets 


My new ride is a bit of a Howler and I love to make her Squeal
Re: Voting for least progress on a project since records began
Oh for heavens sake, it's only 5 years..............Nuclear power stations take about 10 years 

Re: Voting for least progress on a project since records began
Ahmmm. The date on this... viewtopic.php?f=30&t=21082&hilit=ducafe#p170744 ...says Tue Sep 13, 2011 7:53 pm
That 6 years, 3 months, 15 days 31mins... That poor time keeping may have something to do with the late running...

Making up since 2007, sometimes it's true...Honest...
Re: Voting for least progress on a project since records began
is it true the Titanic was designed,build and sunk in half the time????MacV2 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 28, 2017 8:25 pmAhmmm. The date on this... viewtopic.php?f=30&t=21082&hilit=ducafe#p170744 ...says Tue Sep 13, 2011 7:53 pm
That 6 years, 3 months, 15 days 31mins... That poor time keeping may have something to do with the late running...![]()
the older i get,the faster i was 
