my dilemma

General Biker Banter
Post Reply

VTR 1000 or TL 1000

VTR 1000
3
33%
Other
1
11%
TL 1000
5
56%
 
Total votes: 9

smf_12
Posts: 30
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2008 1:49 am
Location: Surrey

my dilemma

Post by smf_12 »

ok. ive just gone on aklot about wanting to use a vtr engime for my next project.

but ever since the other day i have been lookign at the tl1000 engine which is quicker.

Or would you reccomend any other engines? V twin with lots of power obviously 8)

what would you suggest i go for. and please try not to let vote be down to the bike you own!

:lol:
User avatar
Seeker 77
Posts: 1255
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 12:14 pm
Location: Uxbridge, England

Post by Seeker 77 »

Having just bought one i would say the TL is better :D

I should imagine that the Suzuki doesn't have CCTs made of jelly and there is a fair whack more grunt. Go for a TLR engine and that is pumping out 135 bhp at the crank.

The RSV engine and SP1 engine are very hard to work on apparently so you should avoid them. The only thing about the TLR engine is that it is very long and will make the bike the same.
User avatar
Stratman
Posts: 2656
Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2003 10:55 pm
Location: Norwich
Contact:

Post by Stratman »

Yep. Go for the TL. I've always found that 155 mph top end and o-60 in 3.4 seconds were sooo limiting. :D :roll: :D
Two bikes, still only four cylinders!

Image
Jbrebel
Posts: 2126
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 11:24 am
Location: Yorkshire

Post by Jbrebel »

If your purely looking at the better V2 engine it depends what you want from it.

The VTR is a great engine. Typical V2 delivery with loads of torque where you need it and revs less than the Suzi. My bike made 107BHP ATRW on the dyno with a full stage one tune (filter, cans, jet kit etc...)

The TL has stacks more power and is more linear in delivery. Up to banning speed id say the VTR wouldnt be far behind the TL. After that its toast :wink: It has more shunt throught the range.

The TL I had made nearer 122BHP ATRW with only a pair of aftermarket cans.

HTH.

JP.
Beamish
Posts: 2862
Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2007 4:09 pm

Post by Beamish »

If you are going the whole hog the RSV engine has proved to be very reliable with only the dodgy clocks and early lecky to worry about. To be honest buddy you wouldnt go wrong with either of the engines you have mentioned. Avoid the Ducati twins unless you like to tinker.......a lot. The early engines are down on HP (against TLR) and v high maintenance. :lol:

The VTR with side rads is not everyones cup of tea in fightered form so think about the finished look rather than the donk.
I see myself as a sensitive intelligent man but with the heart of a clown that causes me to **ck things up right at that crucial moment........'Jim Morrison'
chuxsta
Posts: 631
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 1:36 am
Location: stockton on tees

Post by chuxsta »

screw the current project.. i picked other for these reasons..

OMG CLICK ME
AND ME CLICK ME
Image
chuxsta
Posts: 631
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 1:36 am
Location: stockton on tees

Post by chuxsta »

people talk about grin factor.....

i fail to see how pootling around in a smart car offering out any thing at the traffic lights for a race and beating everything but a formula one car wouldnt cause a HUGE smile....

i would need deep heat on my middle finger the amount of times i would be flicking it while riding around in one of these... LOL
Image
User avatar
sirch345
Site Admin
Posts: 22382
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2003 10:35 pm
Location: The West Country.

Post by sirch345 »

Stratman wrote:Yep. Go for the TL. I've always found that 155 mph top end and o-60 in 3.4 seconds were sooo limiting. :D :roll: :D
:lol: :lol: :lol:
smf_12
Posts: 30
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2008 1:49 am
Location: Surrey

Post by smf_12 »

you people arnt making this easy for me :lol:
Post Reply