Twins at Birth....

General Biker Banter
Post Reply
User avatar
robnobrakes
Posts: 54
Joined: Fri Jun 09, 2006 8:22 am
Location: Essex Boy

Twins at Birth....

Post by robnobrakes »

Here they are together. 97 track prep'd and 99 road bike

Image
User avatar
Bondy
Posts: 264
Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 10:49 pm
Location: Louth

Post by Bondy »

I'm slightly envious. I can only 1. Your road bikes a load shinyer than mine i ant washed it in to weeks and its mingin.
Jaglifter
Posts: 799
Joined: Mon May 03, 2004 7:35 pm
Location: SWINDON

Post by Jaglifter »

Very nice. :) :) :)
She's my idea of beauty and thats what I ride.
User avatar
sirch345
Site Admin
Posts: 22376
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2003 10:35 pm
Location: The West Country.

Post by sirch345 »

Definitely very nice 8) :D

So how much better does the track bike handle with the up-graded blade forks and Ohlins rear shock :?: compared to your standard road bike suspension,

Chris.
User avatar
robnobrakes
Posts: 54
Joined: Fri Jun 09, 2006 8:22 am
Location: Essex Boy

Post by robnobrakes »

sirch345 wrote:Definitely very nice 8) :D

So how much better does the track bike handle with the up-graded blade forks and Ohlins rear shock :?: compared to your standard road bike suspension,

Chris.
Hi Chris

The Fireblade forks are a little shorter than the Storm forks. They are stiffer, have compression and rebound damping adjustment and require slightly larger discs. End result, the bike turns faster and has more braking power. The bike is very stable. Difficult to say about the Ohlins rear, as the bike is set up for track use, and I have not riden it around a track with a stock rear suspension. Fireblade forks are an excellent upgrade, if you want your bike to turn faster.

Rob
User avatar
sirch345
Site Admin
Posts: 22376
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2003 10:35 pm
Location: The West Country.

Post by sirch345 »

Cheers for the info Rob, much appreciated :!: :D

Chris.
User avatar
Stormin Ben
Posts: 1234
Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2002 12:23 am
Location: Birmingham

Post by Stormin Ben »

robnobrakes wrote: . . and require slightly larger discs. Rob
Odd, mine uses the standard brakes!!

I'd second the other comments though, the blade forks are a brilliant mod :lol:
I've got an inferiority complex
But its not a very good one!
User avatar
robnobrakes
Posts: 54
Joined: Fri Jun 09, 2006 8:22 am
Location: Essex Boy

Post by robnobrakes »

Stormin Ben wrote:
robnobrakes wrote: . . and require slightly larger discs. Rob
Odd, mine uses the standard brakes!!

I'd second the other comments though, the blade forks are a brilliant mod :lol:
The 1998/9 Blade RRW/RRX forks I purchased requires 320mm dia discs. The earlier 1994/7 Blade RRR/RRV forks used the same discs as the Storm. I had to have alloy spacers made to enable the larger discs to be fitted to the Storm 17" wheel. I did not want to fit a Blade 16" wheel. Anyone thinking of fitting Blade forks will do better to use the earlier forks, to save on the cost of having spacers specially made up.

Rob
User avatar
sirch345
Site Admin
Posts: 22376
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2003 10:35 pm
Location: The West Country.

Post by sirch345 »

Stormin Ben wrote:
robnobrakes wrote: . . and require slightly larger discs. Rob
Odd, mine uses the standard brakes!!

I'd second the other comments though, the blade forks are a brilliant mod :lol:
Cheers for the second appinion Ben 8)

Chris.
robnobrakes wrote:The 1998/9 Blade RRW/RRX forks I purchased requires 320mm dia discs. The earlier 1994/7 Blade RRR/RRV forks used the same discs as the Storm. I had to have alloy spacers made to enable the larger discs to be fitted to the Storm 17" wheel. I did not want to fit a Blade 16" wheel. Anyone thinking of fitting Blade forks will do better to use the earlier forks, to save on the cost of having spacers specially made up.

Rob
Cheers for that too Rob, that's a handy bit of advice :!:

Chris.
Post Reply